NSCI ranks 1st and DABS 2nd of 11 funds in the Multi-Sector Securitized Bond Category.
DABS vs NSCI
NSCI −0.02pt a year
0.40%0.38%
NSCI 4.1×the volume
16.4K67.2K
DABS vs NSCI Performance
+2.7%+4.0%
- DABS 0.40%
- NSCI 0.38%, better
- DABS $173M
- NSCI $310M
- DABS +2.7%
- NSCI +4.0%, better
- DABS 5.35%
- NSCI
- DABS 158
- NSCI 269
- DABS 16.4K sh
- NSCI 67.2K sh, better
- DABS $49.92
- NSCI $24.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DABS | NSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B68Higher |
| Mission | C42Higher | F4 |
| Risk | C49 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | A88Higher |
| Durability | B61 | B65Higher |
Rank among Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds
Same Category. DABS and NSCI are both graded against the same 11 Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DABSB
NSCIA
In short
DABS Asset-backed bonds, the debt built on pools of consumer and business loans, are a hand-picked corner of fixed income. DABS is DoubleLine's active run at it: roughly 100 positions, monthly payouts, chasing total return with income alongside.
NSCI Securitized credit is the bond market's plumbing: mortgage, consumer-loan and CLO paper that broad index funds only skim. NSCI is Nuveen's active run at it, holding at least 80% in structured bonds with room to reach below investment grade.
Stated mandate
DABS The Fund seeks long-term total return while also striving to generate current income.
NSCI The Fund seeks a high level of current income and total return. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in securitized credit investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DABS vs NSCI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DABS vs NSCI Cost
Overpaying DABS vs NSCI
$384
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DABS 0.40%
$8,090
NSCI 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DABS | NSCI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $688 | $35 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,658 | $135 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $7,706 | $384 |
- 0.40%DABS
- 0.38%NSCI, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.39%
NSCI 4th cheapest of 11 funds
DABS 7th cheapest of 11 funds
DABS vs NSCI Dividends
- DABS 5.35%
- NSCI
- DABS $2.66
- NSCI
- DABS $0.21
- NSCI $0.11
- DABS Nov 2, 2026
- NSCI Nov 2, 2026
- DABS Pays Nov 6, 2026
- NSCI Pays Nov 3, 2026
- DABS Monthly
- NSCI Monthly
Distribution history
DABS vs NSCI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DABS 1.9%NSCI 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DABS 0.27NSCI 0.06
- Worst fall
- DABS −1.4%NSCI −1.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DABS 0.05NSCI 0.05Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
DABS and NSCI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

