Skip to content

DABS vs PINC

DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF

DABSBNYSE Arca

PGIM Securitized Income ETF

PINCCCboe

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

PINC −0.01pt a year

DABS0.40%PINC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

DABS 17.7×the volume

DABS16.4KPINC925

DABS vs PINC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.2%DABS0.0%PINC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. DABS +0.2%. PINC 0.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−0.75%−0.5%−0.25%0.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DABS 0.40%
PINC 0.39%, better
Fund size
DABS $173M
PINC $26M
1Y total return
DABS +2.5%
PINC No data
Yield (12M)
DABS 4.90%
PINC No data
Holdings
DABS 158
PINC 108
Avg volume (30D)
DABS 16.4K sh, better
PINC 925 sh
NAV per share
DABS $49.92
PINC $49.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DABS: Cost 50, Risk 50, Mission 43, Tradability 66, Holdings 69, Durability 61. PINC: Cost 50, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 39, Durability 37.
Pillar letters and Scores for DABS, PINC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDABSPINC
Cost30% weightC50C50
Mission25% weightC43Not scored
Risk15% weightC50HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB66HigherC41
Holdings10% weightB69HigherD39
Durability5% weightB61HigherD37

Rank among Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DABS and PINC are both graded against the same 11 Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 11 ›

DABS ranks 2nd and PINC 6th of 11 funds in the Multi-Sector Securitized Bond Category.

  1. Rank 1ANSCINuveen Securitized IncomeScore 70
  2. Rank 2BDABSDoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CWDEPrincipal Securitized Debt ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 5CJSIJanus Henderson Securitized Income ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 6CPINCPGIM Securitized Income ETFScore 43
  6. Rank 7CPRABState Street IG Public & Private ABS ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DABSBDoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF

PINCCPGIM Securitized Income ETF

In short

DABS Asset-backed bonds, the debt built on pools of consumer and business loans, are a hand-picked corner of fixed income. DABS is DoubleLine's active run at it: roughly 100 positions, monthly payouts, chasing total return with income alongside.

PINC Most securitized-credit ETFs sit at the short end and float with cash rates. PINC is PGIM's active take with a twist: a duration overlay of Treasury futures and swaps that stretches its rate exposure beyond what its CLOs, CMBS and ABS carry on their own.

Stated mandate

DABS The Fund seeks long-term total return while also striving to generate current income.

PINC The Fund seeks to maximize total return through a combination of current income and capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • DABS The mandate is plainly stated: long-term total return while also striving to generate current income, expressed through roughly 100 securitized positions rather than a broad index sweep.doubleline.com
  • At 0.40%, it prices right at the median for its bond peer group and level with SECU, one of the stronger-standing securitized funds in that group.
  • Distributions land monthly, matching the rhythm of the loan pools underneath.
  • The bond-by-bond lineup is the strongest part of the package, and the fund sits in the upper half of its bond cohort overall.
  • PINC Active across the securitized stack: CMBS, RMBS and CMOs, ABS, and CDOs including CLOs, picked by PGIM's securitized products team instead of an index.sec.gov
  • The overlay is the twist: Treasury futures, rate swaps and options extend duration past what its securitized holdings carry, so it isn't purely a floating-rate sleeve.sec.govpgim.com
  • At 0.39%, the fee lands just under the 0.40% median for its securitized peer group and under iShares' SECU at 0.41%.
  • Mandate is total return from current income plus capital appreciation, with cash paid out quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • DABS Launched in 2025, so the history is thin. There is little track record showing how the portfolio behaves through a full credit cycle.
  • Thinly traded on a modest asset base, so the gap between the price you get and the portfolio's value can be wider than at a giant bond fund.
  • No index sits behind it. Results ride on the manager's security selection, and the 0.40% fee is the price of that judgment.doubleline.com
  • PINC Cheaper shelf-mates exist: Principal's WDE runs 0.19%, roughly half the fee for securitized debt exposure.
  • Extended duration cuts both ways, with more price movement when rates swing than a short-duration securitized fund, plus the usual derivatives plumbing.sec.gov
  • The track record starts in 2026, and it's a small, thinly traded fund, so the spread deserves a look before you place an order.

Full DABS profile⁠

Full PINC profile⁠

DABS vs PINC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DABS vs PINC Cost

Overpaying DABS vs PINC

$192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DABS 0.40%

    $8,090

  • PINC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DABS 0.40%
  • PINC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530DABS $8,090PINC $7,898

Year by year

YearDABSPINCOverpaying
10$723$705$18
20$2,793$2,725$68
30$8,090$7,898$192

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%DABS
  • 0.39%PINC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Sector Securitized Bond funds
  • Median 0.39%

PINC 5th cheapest of 11 funds

DABS 7th cheapest of 11 funds

DABS vs PINC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DABS 4.90%
PINC No data
Payout (12M)
DABS $2.45
PINC No data
Last payment
DABS $0.21
PINC $0.24
Ex-dividend
DABS Oct 1, 2026
PINC Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
DABS Oct 7, 2026
PINC Pays Nov 3, 2026
Frequency
DABS Monthly
PINC Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DABSMonthly · 19 paymentsAll DABS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Apr 1, 2025 $0.10; May 1, 2025 $0.20; Jun 2, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.22; Aug 1, 2025 $0.21; Sep 2, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.20; Dec 23, 2025 $0.19; Feb 2, 2026 $0.19; Mar 2, 2026 $0.19; Apr 1, 2026 $0.23; May 1, 2026 $0.21; Jun 1, 2026 $0.21; Jul 1, 2026 $0.21; Aug 3, 2026 $0.21; Sep 1, 2026 $0.20; Oct 1, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
PINCMonthly · 5 paymentsAll PINC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 30, 2026 $0.17; Jul 31, 2026 $0.21; Aug 31, 2026 $0.21; Sep 30, 2026 $0.21; Oct 30, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

DABS vs PINC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DABS 1.9%since Apr 2025PINC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DABS 0.27since Apr 2025PINC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DABS −1.4%since Mar 2025PINC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DABS 0.05PINC 0.34

DABS and PINC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DABSBvsNSCIA

    DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF · Nuveen Securitized Income

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINCCvsNSCIA

    PGIM Securitized Income ETF · Nuveen Securitized Income

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DABSBvsWDEC

    DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF · Principal Securitized Debt ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINCCvsWDEC

    PGIM Securitized Income ETF · Principal Securitized Debt ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DABSBvsSECUC

    DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF · iShares Securitized Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.41%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PINCCvsSECUC

    PGIM Securitized Income ETF · iShares Securitized Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.41%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.