DDFL ranks 1st and DDSQ 2nd of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Dual Directional Category.
DDFL vs DDSQ
98.6%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
DDFL 2.0×the volume
75.8K38.3K
DDFL vs DDSQ Performance
−0.4%−1.2%
- DDFL 0.79%
- DDSQ 0.79%
- DDFL $160M
- DDSQ $114M
- DDFL +5.6%
- DDSQ
- DDFL 5
- DDSQ 5
- DDFL 75.8K sh, better
- DDSQ 38.3K sh
- DDFL $21.73
- DDSQ $21.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDFL | DDSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | B60 | B60 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A76 |
Rank among S&P 500 Dual Directional funds
Same Category. DDFL and DDSQ are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Dual Directional funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDFLB
DDSQB
In short
DDSQ Innovator's dual directional idea on a short leash: a 5 point buffer on SPY where a modest decline can register as a gain, up to a cap. Its siblings run 15 point buffers across a year. DDSQ resets every quarter.
Stated mandate
DDSQ The fund seeks positive returns in rising markets and certain declining markets, subject to a cap, an inverse performance threshold, and a downside buffer.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDFL vs DDSQ Holdings
How DDFL and DDSQ differ
98.6%
Shared holdings make up 99.6% of DDSQ and 99.1% of DDFL.
About this figure: DDFL holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.
DDSQ holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.
Level by level
- Sector98.1%
- Holdings98.6%
Sector
| Sector | More in DDFLMore in DDSQ | Gap | DDFL | DDSQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | DDSQ +1.4 points | 38.7% | 40.1% | |
| Financials | DDFL +0.7 points | 12.0% | 11.3% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | DDFL +0.6 points | 9.3% | 8.7% | |
| Communication | DDSQ +0.4 points | 9.5% | 9.9% | |
| Industrials | DDFL +0.2 points | 7.8% | 7.6% | |
| Materials | DDFL +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.6% | |
| Utilities | DDFL +0.1 points | 2.0% | 1.9% | |
| Energy | DDFL +0.1 points | 3.5% | 3.4% | |
| Real Estate | DDFL +0.1 points | 1.8% | 1.7% | |
| Health Care | DDSQ +0.1 points | 9.3% | 9.4% | |
| Consumer Staples | DDFL +0.1 points | 4.5% | 4.4% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DDFLMore in DDSQ | Gap | DDFL | DDSQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% | |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DDFL124.7%
- DDSQ106.7%
- DDFL5
- DDSQ5
Asset class
- DDFL
- Stocks
- DDSQ
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in DDFL3
- In both2
- Only in DDSQ3
Only in DDFL
3 securities, 25.6% of DDFL by weight
- Voo 06/30/2027 576.92 P18.53%
- Voo 06/30/2027 686.79 P6.92%
- Voo 06/30/2027 714.26 C0.12%
Only in DDSQ
3 securities, 7.1% of DDSQ by weight
- Voo 12/31/2026 700.9 P3.61%
- Voo 12/31/2026 658.81 P3.52%
- Voo 12/31/2026 707.91 C<0.01%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in DDFLMore in DDSQ | Gap | DDFL | DDSQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | DDSQ +1.04 points | 98.45% | 99.49% | |
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | DDFL +0.55 points | 0.67% | 0.12% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDFL vs DDSQ Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDFL 0.79%
$15,174
DDSQ 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDFL | DDSQ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%DDFL
- 0.79%DDSQ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Dual Directional funds
- Median 0.79%
DDFL cheapest of 7 funds
DDSQ cheapest of 7 funds
DDFL vs DDSQ Dividends
- DDFL None
- DDSQ None
Distribution history
DDFL vs DDSQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDFL 2.2%DDSQ
- Return per unit of risk
- DDFL 1.45DDSQ
- Worst fall
- DDFL −1.7%DDSQ
- Market sensitivity
- DDFL 0.15DDSQ 0.13
DDFL and DDSQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
