Skip to content

DDTJ vs DQJN

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January

DDTJCCboe

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June

DQJNDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

DDTJ −0.11pt a year

DDTJ0.79%DQJN0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

DQJN 6.1×the volume

DDTJ2.18KDQJN13.4K

DDTJ vs DQJN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.8%DDTJ+1.3%DQJN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. DDTJ +1.8%. DQJN +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DDTJ 0.79%, better
DQJN 0.90%
Fund size
DDTJ $18M
DQJN $16M
Holdings
DDTJ 4
DQJN 4
Avg volume (30D)
DDTJ 2.18K sh
DQJN 13.4K sh, better
NAV per share
DDTJ $20.59
DQJN $29.03
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDTJ: Cost 68, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. DQJN: Cost 4, Risk 15, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 24.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDTJ, DQJN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDTJDQJN
Cost30% weightB68HigherF4
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49HigherF15
Tradability15% weightD30A76Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC41HigherF24

Rank among S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDTJ and DQJN are both graded against the same 9 S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 9 ›

DDTJ ranks 4th and DQJN 9th of 9 funds in the S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BDDFZInnovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 62
  2. Rank 2BDDTDInnovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 57
  3. Rank 3BDDTNInnovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 53
  4. Rank 4CDDTJInnovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 52
  5. Rank 5CDDTFInnovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 7DDLNVFT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 38
  7. Rank 9DDQJNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - JuneScore 24

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDTJCInnovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January

DQJNDFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June

In short

DDTJ Buffer funds cushion a drop. This one can pay you for it: if the S&P 500 ETF it references ends the outcome period down within 10%, the fund aims to turn that decline into a gain. Past that, a 10% buffer takes over, and upside is capped.

DQJN No data

Stated mandate

DDTJ The Fund seeks positive returns in both rising markets and certain declining markets. It can capture gains up to a cap, provide positive returns within an inverse performance threshold, and limit losses beyond that threshold.

DQJN No data

Why people hold it

  • DDTJ Down can mean up: a decline within 10% over the outcome period is what the fund seeks to convert into a positive return of the same size, before fees.sec.gov
  • If losses run past the threshold, the inverse payoff switches off and the buffer switches on: the fund seeks returns 10% less than the underlying S&P 500 ETF's loss.sec.gov
  • Fees run 0.79%, the same sticker as the December and November siblings (DDTD, DDTN) and below the 0.85% FT Vest dual-directional alternative (DLNV).
  • Clean calendar plumbing: the outcome period runs January 1 to December 31, then resets, so shares can be held across periods without rolling anything yourself.innovatoretfs.com

DQJN No data

Worth knowing

  • DDTJ It's a cliff, not a slope: if the decline exceeds the threshold at period end, the inverse gains are forfeited and the buffered outcome applies instead.sec.gov
  • Upside is capped, and a new cap is set at each reset, so it can rise or fall. Buy mid-period and your own cap and remaining buffer differ from the stated terms.sec.gov
  • A 2026 launch, small and lightly traded, which makes the bid-ask spread a real part of the cost of getting in and out.

DQJN No data

Full DDTJ profile⁠

Full DQJN profile⁠

DDTJ vs DQJN Holdings

How DDTJ and DQJN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DDTJ and 0.0% of DQJN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for DQJN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for DQJN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DDTJ105.3%
  • DQJN128.6%

Securities held

  • DDTJ4
  • DQJN3

Asset class

DDTJ
Equity
DQJN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in DDTJ4
  • In both0
  • Only in DQJN3

Only in DDTJ

4 securities, 100% of DDTJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 6.87 C100.69%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 606.91 P2.65%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.97 P1.33%

Only in DQJN

3 securities, 100% of DQJN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 C 7.4293.86%
  • 2027-06-17 Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 P 740.6317.93%
  • 2027-06-17 Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 P 648.0515.80%

Weight gaps

DDTJ and DQJN share no securities.

All 6 DDTJ holdings⁠All 5 DQJN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDTJ vs DQJN Cost

Overpaying DQJN vs DDTJ

$1,866

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDTJ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • DQJN 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDTJ 0.79%
  • DQJN 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DQJN $17,040DDTJ $15,174

Year by year

YearDDTJDQJNOverpaying
10$1,405$1,593$188
20$5,331$6,015$684
30$15,174$17,040$1,866

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DDTJ, cheaper
  • 0.90%DQJN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.79%

DDTJ cheapest of 9 funds

DQJN 9th cheapest of 9 funds

DDTJ vs DQJN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DDTJ None
DQJN None

Distribution history

DDTJAll DDTJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DQJNAll DQJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DDTJ vs DQJN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDTJ 0.50DQJN 1.00

Popular comparisons

  • DDTJCvsDDFZB

    Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DQJNDvsDDFZB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - June

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDTJCvsDDTDB

    Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DQJNDvsDDTDB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - December

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDTJCvsDDTNB

    Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DQJNDvsDDTNB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June · Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.