DDTN ranks 3rd and DLFE 7th of 9 funds in the S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer Category.
DDTN vs DLFE
0.0%by weight
DDTN −0.06pt a year
0.79%0.85%
DDTN 3.1×the volume
11.6K3.69K
DDTN vs DLFE Performance
+1.7%+1.7%
- DDTN 0.79%, better
- DLFE 0.85%
- DDTN $31M
- DLFE $70M
- DDTN 5
- DLFE 4
- DDTN 11.6K sh, better
- DLFE 3.69K sh
- DDTN $20.87
- DLFE $32.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDTN | DLFE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B58 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. DDTN and DLFE are both graded against the same 9 S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDTNB
DLFED
In short
DDTN Most buffer ETFs just cushion a drop. DDTN tries to pay you for one: if SPY ends its November-to-November year down as much as 10%, that loss is designed to convert into a matching gain. Upside is capped, and a 10% buffer takes over past that point.
Stated mandate
DDTN The Fund seeks positive returns in both rising markets and certain declining markets, with gains capped when the reference asset rises, positive returns when it falls within the inverse threshold, and loss protection beyond that threshold.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDTN vs DLFE Holdings
How DDTN and DLFE differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DDTN and 0.0% of DLFE.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for DLFE.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DDTNMore in DLFE | DDTN | DLFE |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DDTN142.0%
- DLFE106.3%
- DDTN5
- DLFE3
Asset class
- DDTN
- Equity
- DLFE
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in DDTN5
- In both0
- Only in DLFE3
Only in DDTN
5 securities, 100% of DDTN by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF98.84%
- Voo 10/29/2027 618.38 P29.46%
- Voo 10/29/2027 694.85 P10.92%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20372.63%
- Voo 10/29/2027 722.64 C0.12%
Only in DLFE
3 securities, 100% of DLFE by weight
- 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 6.92101.14%
- 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 689.462.56%
- 2027-02-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 603.282.07%
Weight gaps
DDTN and DLFE share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDTN vs DLFE Cost
Overpaying DLFE vs DDTN
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDTN 0.79%
$15,174
DLFE 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDTN | DLFE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,508 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,706 | $375 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,199 | $1,025 |
- 0.79%DDTN, cheaper
- 0.85%DLFE
- Middle half of S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
DDTN cheapest of 9 funds
DLFE 6th cheapest of 9 funds
DDTN vs DLFE Dividends
- DDTN None
- DLFE None
Distribution history
DDTN vs DLFE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- DDTN 0.55DLFE 0.49
DDTN and DLFE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
