DDTN ranks 3rd and DLNV 7th of 9 funds in the S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer Category.
DDTN vs DLNV
DDTN −0.06pt a year
0.79%0.85%
DDTN 12.0×the volume
11.6K965
DDTN vs DLNV Performance
+9.0%+8.6%
- DDTN 0.79%, better
- DLNV 0.85%
- DDTN $31M
- DLNV $20M
- DDTN 5
- DLNV 4
- DDTN 11.6K sh, better
- DLNV 965 sh
- DDTN $20.87
- DLNV $33.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDTN | DLNV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C52Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | B58 | A70Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | B55 |
Rank among S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. DDTN and DLNV are both graded against the same 9 S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDTNB
DLNVD
In short
DDTN Most buffer ETFs just cushion a drop. DDTN tries to pay you for one: if SPY ends its November-to-November year down as much as 10%, that loss is designed to convert into a matching gain. Upside is capped, and a 10% buffer takes over past that point.
DLNV Most buffer funds just cushion a drop. This one aims to convert it: if SPY finishes the one-year period down but within 10%, DLNV targets an equal-sized gain, with a 10% buffer on deeper losses. Upside is capped, and the cap resets each November.
Stated mandate
DDTN The Fund seeks positive returns in both rising markets and certain declining markets, with gains capped when the reference asset rises, positive returns when it falls within the inverse threshold, and loss protection beyond that threshold.
DLNV The fund seeks to match SPY's price return up to a preset upside cap, or to match the absolute value of SPY losses through a 10% inverse-performance threshold, while buffering 10% of losses beyond that threshold over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDTN vs DLNV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDTN vs DLNV Cost
Overpaying DLNV vs DDTN
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDTN 0.79%
$15,174
DLNV 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDTN | DLNV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,508 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,706 | $375 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,199 | $1,025 |
- 0.79%DDTN, cheaper
- 0.85%DLNV
- Middle half of S&P 500 Dual Directional, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
DDTN cheapest of 9 funds
DLNV 6th cheapest of 9 funds
DDTN vs DLNV Dividends
- DDTN None
- DLNV None
Distribution history
DDTN vs DLNV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- DDTN 0.55DLNV 0.47
DDTN and DLNV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
