Skip to content

DECT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

DECTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

DECT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 4.3×the volume

DECT32.4KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

DECT +5.6pt

DECT+16.2%ZALT+10.6%

DECT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DECT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DECT +11.2%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DECT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
DECT $38M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
DECT +11.2%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Holdings
DECT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
DECT 32.4K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
DECT $40.72
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DECT: Cost 68, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 47, Durability 47. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for DECT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDECTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC42A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB65
Holdings10% weightC47A90Higher
Durability5% weightC47B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DECT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and DECT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 16BSTENiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 18BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 18BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DECTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

DECT A December-dated buffer fund built on SPY's own share price, not the index behind it. It absorbs the first 10% of a year's decline in exchange for a cap on the upside, then resets every December 1.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

DECT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each annual outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing that ETF.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • DECT The deal is written into the prospectus, not left to a manager's judgment: buffer the first 10% of the reference ETF's price loss over a one-year outcome period, capped on the upside, reset each December 1.
  • A registered 1940 Act ETF holding FLEX options on SPY, so the payoff shape comes in an exchange-traded wrapper rather than a bank-issued note.
  • At 0.74% a year it runs slightly under the typical shallow-buffer fund, and cost is one of its stronger suits in a crowded field where fees are the main separator.
  • Part of AllianzIM's dated ladder, which lets the December series be paired with other start months. Its six-month siblings (SIXD, SIXJ, SIXZ) carry the same fee but reset twice a year.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • DECT Thinly traded compared with the giants of the buffer world, so bid-ask spread and order size matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • The stated 10% buffer and the cap apply to a full outcome period. Buy partway through and you inherit whatever protection and upside room are left, which can be more or less.
  • The target is SPY's share-price return, so dividends from the underlying stocks are not part of the payoff, and the fund itself has not been making distributions.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full DECT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

DECT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DECT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying DECT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DECT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DECT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DECT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearDECTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%DECT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

DECT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

DECT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DECT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
DECT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024, same scale for both

DECT1 paymentAll DECT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2024. Jan 16, 2024 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102024
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DECT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DECT 8.3%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DECT 1.33ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DECT −13.3%since Dec 2022ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DECT 0.69ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • DECTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.