ZALT ranks 1st and DECZ 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DECZ vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 89.1×the volume
1.55K138K
DECZ +5.9pt
+16.5%+10.6%
DECZ vs ZALT Performance
+7.9%+7.1%
- DECZ 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- DECZ $37M
- ZALT $840M
- DECZ +7.9%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- DECZ 3.04%
- ZALT
- DECZ 17
- ZALT 503
- DECZ 1.55K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- DECZ $44.10
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DECZ | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A90 |
| Durability | C43 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DECZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DECZC
ZALTA
In short
DECZ Most buffer ETFs trade your upside for the cushion. DECZ skips the hard cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price-index losses each 12-month period, at 0.79% with no waiver.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
DECZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while cushioning the first 8% to 12% of index losses during each twelve-month period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DECZ vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DECZ vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying DECZ vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DECZ 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DECZ | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%DECZ
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
DECZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
DECZ vs ZALT Dividends
- DECZ 3.04%
- ZALT
- DECZ $1.32
- ZALT None
- DECZ $1.32
- ZALT
- DECZ Dec 24, 2025
- ZALT
- DECZ Dec 26, 2025
- ZALT
- DECZ Annual
- ZALT
Distribution history
DECZ vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DECZ 9.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DECZ 1.25ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- DECZ −16.6%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DECZ 0.71ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.