DFAC ranks 3rd and ESUM 22nd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs ESUM
DFAC −0.22pt a year
0.17%0.39%
DFAC 63.0×the volume
2M31.8K
DFAC vs ESUM Performance
+16.1%+12.3%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- ESUM 0.39%
- DFAC $87.7B
- ESUM $195M
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- ESUM +12.3%
- DFAC 0.88%
- ESUM 0.99%, better
- DFAC 2553
- ESUM 202
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- ESUM 31.8K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- ESUM $31.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | ESUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A76 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A95 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A87 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A97Higher | B58 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and ESUM are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
ESUMB
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
ESUM Eventide runs its values screen across the whole US market, not just the blue chips: an active portfolio measured against the Bloomberg U.S. 3000, at 0.39% when the typical active US stock fund charges far more.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
ESUM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in a portfolio of U.S. equity securities selected under the adviser’s values-based screening process.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs ESUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs ESUM Cost
Overpaying ESUM vs DFAC
$4,352
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
ESUM 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | ESUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $705 | $395 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $2,725 | $1,514 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $7,898 | $4,352 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.39%ESUM
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
ESUM 29th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs ESUM Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%
- ESUM 0.99%, better
- DFAC $0.39
- ESUM $0.30
- DFAC $0.10
- ESUM $0.06
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- ESUM Sep 29, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- ESUM Sep 30, 2026
- DFAC Quarterly
- ESUM Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAC vs ESUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%ESUM 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32ESUM 0.82
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%ESUM −8.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99ESUM 0.85
DFAC and ESUM in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.