DFAC ranks 3rd and HTUS 92nd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs HTUS
DFAC −0.79pt a year
0.17%0.96%
DFAC 155.0×the volume
2M12.9K
HTUS +3.5pt
+11.1%+14.6%
DFAC vs HTUS Performance
+69.4%+97.5%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- HTUS 0.96%
- DFAC $87.7B
- HTUS $174M
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- HTUS +15.2%
- DFAC 0.88%
- HTUS 10.52%, better
- DFAC 2553
- HTUS 5
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- HTUS 12.9K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- HTUS $45.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | HTUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A75 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | C40 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A97Higher | B69 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and HTUS are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
HTUSD
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
HTUS Most active US equity funds argue about which stocks to own. HTUS argues about whether to own them at all: a quant strategy that shifts between long and short S&P 500 exposure, running live since 2015.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
HTUS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed strategy using long and short positions in ETFs and related instruments tied primarily to the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs HTUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs HTUS Cost
Overpaying HTUS vs DFAC
$14,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
HTUS 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | HTUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $1,695 | $1,385 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $6,383 | $5,172 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $18,034 | $14,488 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.96%HTUS
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
HTUS 99th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs HTUS Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%
- HTUS 10.52%, better
- DFAC $0.39
- HTUS $4.72
- DFAC $0.10
- HTUS $4.72
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- HTUS Dec 26, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- HTUS Dec 31, 2025
- DFAC Quarterly
- HTUS Annual
Distribution history
DFAC vs HTUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAC
- HTUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%, betterHTUS 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32HTUS 1.48, better
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%, betterHTUS −24.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99HTUS 1.04
DFAC and HTUS in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.