DFAC ranks 3rd and KONG 98th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs KONG
DFAC −0.72pt a year
0.17%0.89%
DFAC 1986.3×the volume
2M1.01K
DFAC +5.8pt
+10.8%+5.0%
DFAC vs KONG Performance
+67.2%+27.5%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- KONG 0.89%
- DFAC $87.6B
- KONG $22M
- DFAC +15.9%, better
- KONG +6.3%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- KONG 0.35%
- DFAC 2550
- KONG 35
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- KONG 1.01K sh
- DFAC $44.79
- KONG $31.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | KONG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F23 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B56 |
| Durability | A97Higher | C46 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and KONG are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
KONGD
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
KONG An actively run book of roughly 60 large- and mid-cap stocks plus REITs, with an options and volatility toolkit written into the mandate. The name is the pitch: pick the companies first, keep hedging instruments on the shelf.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
KONG The Fund seeks total return through income and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs KONG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs KONG Cost
Overpaying KONG vs DFAC
$13,326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
KONG 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | KONG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $1,576 | $1,266 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $5,953 | $4,742 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $16,872 | $13,326 |
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- 0.89%KONG
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
KONG 92nd cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs KONG Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- KONG 0.35%
- DFAC $0.39
- KONG $0.11
- DFAC $0.10
- KONG $0.11
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- KONG Dec 24, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- KONG Dec 26, 2025
- DFAC Quarterly
- KONG Annual
Distribution history
DFAC vs KONG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAC
- KONG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%KONG 9.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32, betterKONG 0.54
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%KONG −18.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99KONG 0.59
DFAC and KONG in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.