DFAC ranks 3rd and LCTU 6th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAC vs LCTU
LCTU −0.02pt a year
0.17%0.15%
DFAC 27.4×the volume
2M73.2K
DFAC +0.6pt
+11.1%+10.5%
DFAC vs LCTU Performance
+69.4%+64.5%
- DFAC 0.17%
- LCTU 0.15%, better
- DFAC $87.7B
- LCTU $1.16B
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- LCTU +9.8%
- DFAC 0.88%
- LCTU 0.97%, better
- DFAC 2553
- LCTU 323
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- LCTU 73.2K sh
- DFAC $44.87
- LCTU $80.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAC | LCTU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B66Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | A85 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A81 |
| Durability | A97Higher | A86 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAC and LCTU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFACA
LCTUA
In short
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
LCTU BlackRock's climate pick: an active Russell 1000 portfolio tilted toward companies it scores as transition-ready, at 0.15% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027. Launched in 2021 with the biggest first-day haul the ETF industry had seen.
Stated mandate
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
LCTU LCTU pursues long-term capital growth through U.S. large- and mid-cap equities that BlackRock judges more capable of benefiting from the shift toward a low-carbon economy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAC vs LCTU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAC vs LCTU Cost
Overpaying DFAC vs LCTU
$409
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
LCTU 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAC | LCTU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $274 | $36 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $1,071 | $140 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $3,137 | $409 |
- 0.17%DFAC
- 0.15%LCTU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
LCTU 6th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAC vs LCTU Dividends
- DFAC 0.88%
- LCTU 0.97%, better
- DFAC $0.39
- LCTU $0.79
- DFAC $0.10
- LCTU $0.20
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- LCTU Sep 15, 2026
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- LCTU Sep 18, 2026
- DFAC Quarterly
- LCTU Quarterly
Distribution history
DFAC vs LCTU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DFAC
- LCTU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAC 12.6%LCTU 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAC 1.32LCTU 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- DFAC −23.1%, betterLCTU −25.9%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAC 0.99LCTU 1.01
DFAC and LCTU in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC

Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.