Skip to content

DFAC vs RHRX

Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

DFACANYSE Arca

Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF

RHRXDNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

DFAC −1.21pt a year

DFAC0.17%RHRX1.38%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAC 106.8×the volume

DFAC2MRHRX18.8K

3Y return · a year

DFAC +0.7pt

DFAC+22.3%RHRX+21.6%

DFAC vs RHRX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+16.1%DFAC+15.9%RHRX

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DFAC +16.1%. RHRX +15.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFAC 0.17%, better
RHRX 1.38%
Fund size
DFAC $87.7B
RHRX $58M
1Y total return
DFAC +16.1%, better
RHRX +15.9%
Yield (12M)
DFAC 0.88%
RHRX No data
Holdings
DFAC 2553
RHRX 5
Avg volume (30D)
DFAC 2M sh, better
RHRX 18.8K sh
NAV per share
DFAC $44.87
RHRX $21.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAC: Cost 94, Risk 66, Mission 100, Tradability 87, Holdings 87, Durability 97. RHRX: Cost 7, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 26, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAC, RHRX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFACRHRX
Cost30% weightA94HigherF7
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherB55
Tradability15% weightA87HigherD32
Holdings10% weightA87HigherD26
Durability5% weightA97HigherB64

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAC and RHRX are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAC ranks 3rd and RHRX 110th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 4ADYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETFScore 83
  5. Rank 108DMSTBLHA Market State Tactical Beta ETFScore 30
  6. Rank 110DRHRXAdaptive Tactical Rotation ETFScore 27
  7. Rank 111DGGMGGM Macro Alignment ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFACADimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

RHRXDAdaptive Tactical Rotation ETF

In short

DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.

RHRX A fund of ETFs with a market-timing switch: an S&P 500 core that can be hedged with options, plus permission to rotate into Treasury bond ETFs, cash, or inverse ETFs when its trend model turns negative.

Stated mandate

DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.

RHRX The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • DFAC 0.17% a year for an actively run fund, well under the median fee among active US equity ETFs.
  • About 2,600 US stocks under one ticker, so it holds the market broadly rather than a narrow slice of it.
  • Federal income-tax implications sit inside the stated objective, not in a footnote, so they factor into what managers buy and sell.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund with a track record running back to 2007 and one of the strongest implementations in its peer group.
  • RHRX Unusually flexible mandate for an equity fund: the prospectus allows hedging S&P 500 positions with puts and calls and moving into treasury bond ETFs, cash, or inverse ETFs in downtrends.sec.gov
  • The signal set is disclosed rather than vague: price momentum, volatility, and comparative indicators versus certain indices drive when the portfolio turns defensive.sec.gov
  • Exposure arrives through unaffiliated ETFs whose holdings are generally S&P 500 common stocks, so the underlying is familiar large-cap equity, not exotic single names.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021 inside a 1940 Act ETF wrapper, with daily holdings disclosure and the same rules that govern plain index funds.

Worth knowing

  • DFAC Actively managed, so there's no published index to check it against. Holdings and tilts shift at the managers' discretion.
  • Dimensional's own DFAU runs a US core equity mandate for 0.12%, a slightly lighter fee for a similar shelf.
  • All stocks, all US: the mandate is capital appreciation from equities, so it takes the market's full swings, and cash arrives quarterly.
  • RHRX Costs 1.38% a year, more than double the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and many times cheap core rivals like DFAU (0.12%) or AVLC (0.15%).
  • Small and thinly traded, which typically means wider bid/ask spreads and more price impact on larger orders than with headline-size funds.
  • Defensive mode can mean heavy cash or leveraged and inverse ETFs, which reset daily; a trend model that turns early or late shows up directly in results.sec.gov

Full DFAC profile⁠

Full RHRX profile⁠

DFAC vs RHRX Holdings

How DFAC and RHRX differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DFAC and 0.0% of RHRX.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors67.3%
  • Countryby domicile98.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in DFAC and RHRX, widest gap first
SectorMore in DFACMore in RHRX
EnergyRHRX +11.9 points
Health CareRHRX +11.1 points
FinancialsDFAC +10.9 points
TechnologyRHRX +9.4 points
IndustrialsDFAC +9.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDFAC +4.8 points
Consumer StaplesDFAC +3.6 points
MaterialsDFAC +2.4 points
UtilitiesDFAC +1.2 points
CommunicationDFAC +0.5 points
Real EstateRHRX +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFAC and RHRX, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFACMore in RHRX
TaiwanRHRX +0.6 points
United StatesDFAC +0.5 points
Other countries (15)Same weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFAC26.4%
  • RHRX100.0%

Securities held

  • DFAC2,550
  • RHRX5

Asset class

DFAC
Equity
RHRX
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DFAC2,550
  • In both0
  • Only in RHRX5

Only in DFAC

2,550 securities, 99.7% of DFAC by weight

  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000015.78%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0015.42%
  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006254.79%

Only in RHRX

5 securities, 100% of RHRX by weight

  • SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust47.67%
  • State Stret Enrgy Slect Sec Spdr Etf18.68%
  • Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund17.12%

Weight gaps

DFAC and RHRX share no securities.

All 2,598 DFAC holdings⁠All 4 RHRX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAC vs RHRX Cost

Overpaying RHRX vs DFAC

$21,008

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAC 0.17%

    $3,546

  • RHRX 1.38%

    $24,554

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAC 0.17%
  • RHRX 1.38%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530RHRX $24,554DFAC $3,546

Year by year

YearDFACRHRXOverpaying
10$310$2,395$2,085
20$1,211$8,848$7,637
30$3,546$24,554$21,008

Expense ratio

  • 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
  • 1.38%RHRX
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds

RHRX 112th cheapest of 121 funds

DFAC vs RHRX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAC 0.88%
RHRX No data
Payout (12M)
DFAC $0.39
RHRX None
Last payment
DFAC $0.10
RHRX No data
Ex-dividend
DFAC Sep 22, 2026
RHRX No data
Paid on
DFAC Sep 24, 2026
RHRX No data
Frequency
DFAC Quarterly
RHRX No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DFACQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll DFAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2021 $0.06; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.11; Mar 22, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.09; Dec 20, 2022 $0.12; Mar 21, 2023 $0.06; Jun 21, 2023 $0.09; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.10; Mar 19, 2024 $0.07; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.10; Mar 25, 2025 $0.08; Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.11; Dec 16, 2025 $0.09; Mar 24, 2026 $0.10; Jun 23, 2026 $0.11; Sep 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
RHRXAll RHRX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFAC vs RHRX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAC 12.6%, betterRHRX 12.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAC 1.32, betterRHRX 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAC −23.1%RHRX −25.3%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAC 0.99RHRX 1.00

DFAC and RHRX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DFACAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHRXDvsAVLCA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFACAvsDFAUA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHRXDvsDFAUA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFACAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RHRXDvsDYNFA

    Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.