Skip to content

DFAU vs FFLC

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

DFAUANYSE Arca

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF

FFLCACboe

Overlap

41.7%by weight

Expense ratio

DFAU −0.26pt a year

DFAU0.12%FFLC0.38%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAU 5.6×the volume

DFAU547KFFLC97.9K

5Y return · a year

FFLC +4.2pt

DFAU+11.0%FFLC+15.2%

DFAU vs FFLC Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+68.6%DFAU+103.2%FFLC

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. DFAU +68.6%. FFLC +103.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%50%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DFAU 0.12%, better
FFLC 0.38%
Fund size
DFAU $12.6B
FFLC $1.24B
1Y total return
DFAU +14.5%, better
FFLC +12.5%
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.91%
FFLC 1.03%, better
Holdings
DFAU 2163
FFLC 125
Avg volume (30D)
DFAU 547K sh, better
FFLC 97.9K sh
NAV per share
DFAU $50.91
FFLC $58.08
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAU: Cost 97, Risk 63, Mission 84, Tradability 87, Holdings 84, Durability 91. FFLC: Cost 77, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings 64, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAU, FFLC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFAUFFLC
Cost30% weightA97HigherA77
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherB58
Tradability15% weightA87HigherA76
Holdings10% weightA84HigherB64
Durability5% weightA91HigherA85

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAU and FFLC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAU ranks 2nd and FFLC 16th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 16ACGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETFScore 72
  5. Rank 16AFFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETFScore 72
  6. Rank 16AINROiShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETFScore 72

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFAUADimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

FFLCAFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF

In short

DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.

FFLC Fidelity's stock pickers running large-cap core the old-fashioned way: roughly 100 names chosen by analysts, priced like a cheap fund rather than a premium active one. Human research, index-fund plumbing.

Stated mandate

DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.

FFLC The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments in equity securities, pursuing a diversified domestic large-cap core strategy.

Why people hold it

  • DFAU Charges 0.12% a year, well under the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and the cheapest of the top-graded names in its group (AVLC, DFAC, FELC).
  • Holds roughly 2,400 US companies, so no single name steers the fund. Whole-market coverage, not a concentrated bet.
  • Active without the stock-picking drama: it leans weights toward value, profitability and momentum, using the Russell 3000 as its reference point rather than a rigid rulebook.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its active US equity peer group.
  • FFLC 0.38% for genuine active management, below the typical fee for active US stock ETFs. You're paying for the research desk, not the wrapper.
  • About 100 holdings, actively chosen in pursuit of long-term capital growth. This is a real portfolio of decisions, not an index fund wearing an active label.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades in reasonable size, so entering and exiting doesn't usually mean wrestling with a wide spread.
  • Stands among the stronger builds in a crowded field of active US equity ETFs, where hundreds of funds compete for the same core slot.

Worth knowing

  • DFAU Those tilts cut both ways: results can drift from a plain Russell 3000 fund for long stretches, in either direction.
  • No published index behind it. The trade-off for flexibility is that you're buying Dimensional's process, not a public set of rules you can check line by line.
  • Distributions land quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate is long-term capital appreciation rather than income.
  • FFLC Cheap for active, still pricier than systematic core rivals like FELC (0.18%) or AVLC (0.15%). That gap is the cost of human stock picking.
  • With roughly 100 names, single positions carry real weight, so the ride can be bumpier than a 500-stock index fund in either direction.
  • Active by design: the portfolio can look and behave quite differently from a plain large-cap index over any given stretch.

Full DFAU profile⁠

Full FFLC profile⁠

DFAU vs FFLC Holdings

How DFAU and FFLC differ

Overlap by weight

41.7%

Shared holdings make up 85.4% of FFLC and 47.4% of DFAU.

Level by level

  • Holdings93 in both41.7%
  • Countryby domicile91.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors94.1%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in DFAU and FFLC, widest gap first
SectorMore in DFAUMore in FFLCGap
FinancialsDFAU +2.7 points
Health CareFFLC +1.7 points
TechnologyDFAU +1.6 points
CommunicationFFLC +1.3 points
Real EstateFFLC +1.1 points
UtilitiesDFAU +0.9 points
IndustrialsFFLC +0.9 points
EnergyFFLC +0.8 points
MaterialsDFAU +0.5 points
Consumer StaplesFFLC +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDFAU +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFAU and FFLC, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFAUMore in FFLCGap
United StatesDFAU +8.5 points
United KingdomFFLC +2.7 points
TaiwanFFLC +2.4 points
CanadaFFLC +0.8 points
SwitzerlandFFLC +0.7 points
South KoreaFFLC +0.6 points
Other countries (10)FFLC +1.3 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFAU33.3%
  • FFLC41.6%

Securities held

  • DFAU2,161
  • FFLC121

Asset class

DFAU
Stocks
FFLC
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in DFAU2,068
  • In both93
  • Only in FFLC28

Only in DFAU

2,068 securities, 52.4% of DFAU by weight

  • Alphabet Inc1.85%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Cl-B1.27%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co1.23%

Only in FFLC

28 securities, 13.7% of FFLC by weight

  • Taiwan Semic Mfg Co Ltd Sp Adr2.32%
  • Shell PLC Spons Adr1.29%
  • Chubb Ltd1.01%

Weight gaps

All 93 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in DFAU and FFLC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DFAUMore in FFLCGap
Alphabet Inc - Class AGOOGLFFLC +2.98 points
Apple Inc.AAPLDFAU +2.56 points
Meta Platforms IncMETAFFLC +1.83 points
Amazon.com Inc.AMZNFFLC +1.63 points
Boeing Co/TheBAFFLC +1.41 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDAFFLC +1.31 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific.TMOFFLC +1.22 points
Keurig Dr Pepper IncKDPFFLC +1.18 points

All 2,381 DFAU holdings⁠All 103 FFLC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAU vs FFLC Cost

Overpaying FFLC vs DFAU

$5,186

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAU 0.12%

    $2,520

  • FFLC 0.38%

    $7,706

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAU 0.12%
  • FFLC 0.38%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530FFLC $7,706DFAU $2,520

Year by year

YearDFAUFFLCOverpaying
10$220$688$468
20$859$2,658$1,799
30$2,520$7,706$5,186

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
  • 0.38%FFLC
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds

FFLC 28th cheapest of 121 funds

DFAU vs FFLC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.91%
FFLC 1.03%, better
Payout (12M)
DFAU $0.47
FFLC $0.60
Last payment
DFAU $0.12
FFLC $0.13
Ex-dividend
DFAU Sep 22, 2026
FFLC Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
DFAU Sep 24, 2026
FFLC Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
DFAU Quarterly
FFLC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

DFAUQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll DFAU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2020 $0.03; Mar 23, 2021 $0.05; Jun 22, 2021 $0.08; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.12; Mar 22, 2022 $0.07; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.11; Mar 21, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2023 $0.10; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.13; Mar 19, 2024 $0.08; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.16; Mar 25, 2025 $0.09; Jun 24, 2025 $0.12; Sep 23, 2025 $0.12; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.12; Sep 22, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
FFLCQuarterly · 27 paymentsAll FFLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 27 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Jun 19, 2020 $0.02; Sep 18, 2020 $0.06; Dec 18, 2020 $0.14; Dec 30, 2020 $0.007; Mar 19, 2021 $0.09; Jun 18, 2021 $0.09; Sep 17, 2021 $0.09; Dec 17, 2021 $0.23; Mar 18, 2022 $0.09; Jun 17, 2022 $0.12; Sep 16, 2022 $0.13; Dec 16, 2022 $0.15; Mar 17, 2023 $0.08; Jun 16, 2023 $0.04; Sep 15, 2023 $0.04; Dec 15, 2023 $0.04; Mar 15, 2024 $0.06; Jun 21, 2024 $0.11; Sep 20, 2024 $0.11; Dec 20, 2024 $0.10; Mar 21, 2025 $0.12; Jun 20, 2025 $0.13; Sep 19, 2025 $0.11; Dec 19, 2025 $0.23; Mar 20, 2026 $0.12; Jun 18, 2026 $0.13; Sep 18, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

DFAU vs FFLC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DFAU
  • FFLC
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: DFAU −23.6% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAU 12.4%, betterFFLC 13.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAU 1.38, betterFFLC 1.34
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAU −23.6%FFLC −19.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAU 1.01FFLC 0.99

Popular comparisons

  • DFAUAvsDFACA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFLCAvsAVLCA

    Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFLCAvsDFACA

    Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FFLCAvsDYNFA

    Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.