DFAU ranks 2nd and GGM 111th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DFAU vs GGM
DFAU −0.82pt a year
0.12%0.94%
DFAU 381.8×the volume
555K1.45K
DFAU +14.0pt
+21.6%+7.6%
DFAU vs GGM Performance
+12.9%+7.8%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- GGM 0.94%
- DFAU $12.8B
- GGM $20M
- DFAU +12.9%, better
- GGM +7.8%
- DFAU 0.91%
- GGM 1.45%, better
- DFAU 2163
- GGM 5
- DFAU 555K sh, better
- GGM 1.45K sh
- DFAU $52.07
- GGM $29.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAU | GGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | F16 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | F23 |
| Durability | A91Higher | D26 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAU and GGM are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFAUA
GGMD
In short
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
GGM Think of the economy as having seasons. GGM is an actively managed fund-of-funds that dresses for the current one, shifting among sector and style ETFs as the macro picture changes, all inside a single ticker.
Stated mandate
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
GGM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAU vs GGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAU vs GGM Cost
Overpaying GGM vs DFAU
$15,184
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
GGM 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAU | GGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $1,661 | $1,441 |
| 20 | $859 | $6,260 | $5,401 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $17,704 | $15,184 |
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- 0.94%GGM
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
GGM 98th cheapest of 121 funds
DFAU vs GGM Dividends
- DFAU 0.91%
- GGM 1.45%, better
- DFAU $0.47
- GGM $0.43
- DFAU $0.12
- GGM $0.43
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- GGM Dec 26, 2025
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- GGM Jan 5, 2026
- DFAU Quarterly
- GGM Annual
Distribution history
DFAU vs GGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAU 12.4%GGM 11.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAU 1.38, betterGGM 0.42
- Worst fall
- DFAU −23.6%GGM −19.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAU 1.01GGM 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.