DFAW ranks 1st and GPT 23rd of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
DFAW vs GPT
DFAW −0.46pt a year
0.23%0.69%
DFAW 78.2×the volume
98.6K1.26K
DFAW vs GPT Performance
+15.6%+6.4%
- DFAW 0.23%, better
- GPT 0.69%
- DFAW $1.71B
- GPT $23M
- DFAW +15.6%, better
- GPT +6.4%
- DFAW 1.30%, better
- GPT 0.69%
- DFAW 6
- GPT 74
- DFAW 98.6K sh, better
- GPT 1.26K sh
- DFAW $82.88
- GPT $33.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFAW | GPT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | D32 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | F22 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. DFAW and GPT are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFAWA
GPTC
In short
GPT The ticker is the thesis. GPT hands global stock picking to large language models, which assemble an equal-weighted portfolio of big companies instead of a human manager's conviction list.
Stated mandate
GPT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFAW vs GPT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFAW vs GPT Cost
Overpaying GPT vs DFAW
$8,670
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFAW 0.23%
$4,759
GPT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFAW | GPT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $1,232 | $813 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $4,697 | $3,067 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $13,429 | $8,670 |
- 0.23%DFAW, cheaper
- 0.69%GPT
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
DFAW 2nd cheapest of 44 funds
GPT 22nd cheapest of 44 funds
DFAW vs GPT Dividends
- DFAW 1.30%, better
- GPT 0.69%
- DFAW $1.08
- GPT $0.23
- DFAW $0.26
- GPT $0.23
- DFAW Sep 22, 2026
- GPT Dec 23, 2025
- DFAW Sep 24, 2026
- GPT Dec 24, 2025
- DFAW Quarterly
- GPT Annual
Distribution history
DFAW vs GPT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFAW 11.8%GPT 13.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFAW 1.37GPT 0.64
- Worst fall
- DFAW −16.9%GPT −25.6%
- Market sensitivity
- DFAW 0.91GPT 0.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.