Skip to content

DFAW vs INFL

Dimensional World Equity ETF

DFAWANYSE Arca

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF

INFLCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DFAW −0.62pt a year

DFAW0.23%INFL0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

INFL 1.3×the volume

DFAW98.6KINFL132K

3Y return · a year

DFAW +0.4pt

DFAW+20.7%INFL+20.3%

DFAW vs INFL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+15.6%DFAW+17.1%INFL

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. DFAW +15.6%. INFL +17.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%30%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DFAW 0.23%, better
INFL 0.85%
Fund size
DFAW $1.71B
INFL $1.53B
1Y total return
DFAW +15.6%
INFL +17.1%, better
Yield (12M)
DFAW 1.30%, better
INFL 0.79%
Holdings
DFAW 6
INFL 51
Avg volume (30D)
DFAW 98.6K sh
INFL 132K sh, better
NAV per share
DFAW $82.88
INFL $50.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAW: Cost 95, Risk 75, Mission 100, Tradability 83, Holdings 32, Durability 79. INFL: Cost 22, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 37, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAW, INFL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFAWINFL
Cost30% weightA95HigherF22
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherC48
Tradability15% weightA83HigherB63
Holdings10% weightD32D37Higher
Durability5% weightA79HigherA78

Rank among Global Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAW and INFL are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Equity⁠

Category · 44 funds
See all 44 ›

DFAW ranks 1st and INFL 26th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVGEAvantis All Equity Markets ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AAVTMAvantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1Score 79
  3. Rank 1ABDVLiShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETFScore 79
  4. Rank 1ADFAWDimensional World Equity ETFScore 79
  5. Rank 5ABFLXiShares Flexible Equity Active ETFScore 74
  6. Rank 25CACTSFIS Tactical Equity ETFScore 43
  7. Rank 26CINFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETFScore 41
  8. Rank 27CFGSMFrontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFAWADimensional World Equity ETF

INFLCHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF

In short

DFAW No data

INFL Most equity funds chase an index. INFL chases purchasing power: a hand-picked book of roughly 50 stocks built around one question, what holds up when prices rise. Active since 2021, with no benchmark to hide behind.

Stated mandate

DFAW No data

INFL The Fund targets long-term capital appreciation after accounting for inflation.

Why people hold it

DFAW No data

  • INFL The mandate is unusually specific: long-term capital appreciation after accounting for inflation, not simply beating a stock index. That framing drives value-led, bottom-up stock picking.
  • About 50 names across US and developed international markets. Concentrated enough that individual picks actually move the portfolio, which is the point of hiring an active manager.
  • Trades well for a niche active fund. Liquidity and spreads sit near the top of its global active equity peer group, so getting in and out is rarely the expensive part.
  • Launched in 2021 and since grown past the billion-dollar mark, giving it an operating history and a scale most thematic launches never reach. Pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

DFAW No data

  • INFL At 0.85% a year, it costs more than the typical global active equity fund. Broad index peers like GSWO and DFAW charge a fraction of that.
  • No index to grade it against. This is a manager's book of inflation beneficiaries, so the process and the holdings, not tracking error, are what you are judging.
  • A concentrated, theme-driven portfolio moves on its own schedule. It can look nothing like the broad market for long stretches, in either direction.

Full DFAW profile⁠

Full INFL profile⁠

DFAW vs INFL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAW vs INFL Cost

Overpaying INFL vs DFAW

$11,440

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAW 0.23%

    $4,759

  • INFL 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAW 0.23%
  • INFL 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530INFL $16,199DFAW $4,759

Year by year

YearDFAWINFLOverpaying
10$419$1,508$1,089
20$1,630$5,706$4,076
30$4,759$16,199$11,440

Expense ratio

  • 0.23%DFAW, cheaper
  • 0.85%INFL
  • Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.69%

DFAW 2nd cheapest of 44 funds

INFL 34th cheapest of 44 funds

DFAW vs INFL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAW 1.30%, better
INFL 0.79%
Payout (12M)
DFAW $1.08
INFL $0.40
Last payment
DFAW $0.26
INFL $0.09
Ex-dividend
DFAW Sep 22, 2026
INFL Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
DFAW Sep 24, 2026
INFL Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
DFAW Quarterly
INFL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DFAWQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll DFAW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.23; Mar 19, 2024 $0.10; Jun 18, 2024 $0.30; Sep 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 19, 2024 $0.30; Mar 25, 2025 $0.14; Jun 24, 2025 $0.36; Sep 23, 2025 $0.24; Dec 18, 2025 $0.28; Mar 24, 2026 $0.16; Jun 23, 2026 $0.38; Sep 22, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
INFLQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll INFL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2021 $0.04; Jun 28, 2021 $0.06; Sep 28, 2021 $0.06; Dec 28, 2021 $0.13; Mar 29, 2022 $0.09; Jun 28, 2022 $0.18; Sep 28, 2022 $0.17; Dec 28, 2022 $0.08; Mar 29, 2023 $0.08; Jun 28, 2023 $0.16; Sep 27, 2023 $0.15; Dec 27, 2023 $0.11; Mar 27, 2024 $0.16; Jun 26, 2024 $0.14; Sep 25, 2024 $0.17; Dec 24, 2024 $0.21; Mar 26, 2025 $0.17; Jun 25, 2025 $0.19; Sep 24, 2025 $0.10; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 25, 2026 $0.08; Jun 24, 2026 $0.13; Sep 23, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

DFAW vs INFL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAW 11.8%, betterINFL 16.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAW 1.37, betterINFL 0.99
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAW −16.9%since Sep 2023INFL −21.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAW 0.91INFL 0.53

Popular comparisons

  • DFAWAvsAVGEA

    Dimensional World Equity ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INFLCvsAVGEA

    Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAWAvsAVTMA

    Dimensional World Equity ETF · Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INFLCvsAVTMA

    Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF 1

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAWAvsBDVLA

    Dimensional World Equity ETF · iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.23% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INFLCvsBDVLA

    Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.