DFLV ranks 4th and LOPP 63rd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs LOPP
DFLV −0.69pt a year
0.21%0.90%
DFLV 2521.2×the volume
658K261
DFLV +3.7pt
+22.7%+19.0%
DFLV vs LOPP Performance
+29.3%+7.9%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- LOPP 0.90%
- DFLV $7.39B
- LOPP $14M
- DFLV +29.3%, better
- LOPP +7.9%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- LOPP 0.77%
- DFLV 336
- LOPP 72
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- LOPP 261 sh
- DFLV $41.80
- LOPP $35.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | LOPP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F5 |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C43 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and LOPP are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
LOPPF
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
LOPP Old-school Gabelli value with a sustainability screen on top: US-listed stocks priced below what the adviser thinks a buyer would pay for the whole company. Active stockpicking, not an index clone.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
LOPP The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in U.S.-listed stocks that satisfy its sustainability guidelines. It emphasizes companies trading at a material discount to the Adviser’s estimate of private market value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs LOPP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs LOPP Cost
Overpaying LOPP vs DFLV
$12,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
LOPP 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | LOPP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,593 | $1,210 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $6,015 | $4,524 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $17,040 | $12,683 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.90%LOPP
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
LOPP 61st cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs LOPP Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- LOPP 0.77%
- DFLV $0.57
- LOPP $0.27
- DFLV $0.16
- LOPP $0.27
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- LOPP Dec 29, 2025
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- LOPP Jan 9, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- LOPP Annual
Distribution history
DFLV vs LOPP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%, betterLOPP 15.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterLOPP 0.91
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%LOPP −25.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80LOPP 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.