DFLV ranks 4th and MDLV 38th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs MDLV
DFLV −0.37pt a year
0.21%0.58%
DFLV 71.8×the volume
658K9.16K
DFLV +6.4pt
+21.8%+15.4%
DFLV vs MDLV Performance
+29.6%+19.6%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- MDLV 0.58%
- DFLV $7.39B
- MDLV $48M
- DFLV +29.6%, better
- MDLV +19.6%
- DFLV 1.35%
- MDLV 2.53%, better
- DFLV 336
- MDLV 39
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- MDLV 9.16K sh
- DFLV $41.86
- MDLV $32.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | MDLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D32 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A83Higher | C40 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and MDLV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
MDLVC
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
MDLV An income-first value book in ETF form: a few dozen hand-picked dividend payers, mostly $25B-plus companies. Where much of US large value runs on rules, this one runs on one team's judgment.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
MDLV The Fund seeks high current income and long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs MDLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs MDLV Cost
Overpaying MDLV vs DFLV
$7,096
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
MDLV 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | MDLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,041 | $658 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,986 | $2,495 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $11,453 | $7,096 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.58%MDLV
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
MDLV 41st cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs MDLV Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- MDLV 2.53%, better
- DFLV $0.57
- MDLV $0.82
- DFLV $0.16
- MDLV $0.19
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- MDLV Sep 28, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- MDLV Sep 30, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- MDLV Quarterly
Distribution history
DFLV vs MDLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%MDLV 10.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterMDLV 1.10
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%MDLV −10.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80MDLV 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.