DFLV ranks 4th and PZLV 45th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs PZLV
DFLV −0.39pt a year
0.21%0.60%
DFLV 432.4×the volume
658K1.52K
DFLV vs PZLV Performance
+3.2%+3.2%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- PZLV 0.60%
- DFLV $7.39B
- PZLV $72M
- DFLV +29.3%
- PZLV
- DFLV 1.35%
- PZLV
- DFLV 336
- PZLV 41
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- PZLV 1.52K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- PZLV $31.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | PZLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D25 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76 | A76 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A83Higher | F18 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and PZLV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
PZLVC
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
PZLV Pzena has run classic value money for institutions for years; PZLV puts that discipline in an ETF. Bottom-up research on beaten-down U.S. large caps, with the Russell 1000 Value as a yardstick rather than a blueprint.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
PZLV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It primarily invests in U.S. large-cap value stocks selected through fundamental, bottom-up research and a classic value approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs PZLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs PZLV Cost
Overpaying PZLV vs DFLV
$7,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
PZLV 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | PZLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,076 | $693 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $4,116 | $2,625 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $11,817 | $7,460 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.60%PZLV
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
PZLV 47th cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs PZLV Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- PZLV
- DFLV $0.57
- PZLV None
- DFLV $0.16
- PZLV
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- PZLV
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- PZLV
- DFLV Quarterly
- PZLV
Distribution history
DFLV vs PZLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%PZLV
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38PZLV
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%PZLV
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80PZLV −0.30
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.