DFLV ranks 4th and SMRI 40th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs SMRI
DFLV −0.50pt a year
0.21%0.71%
DFLV 40.2×the volume
658K16.4K
SMRI +4.6pt
+22.7%+27.3%
DFLV vs SMRI Performance
+29.3%+37.4%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- SMRI 0.71%
- DFLV $7.39B
- SMRI $708M
- DFLV +29.3%
- SMRI +37.4%, better
- DFLV 1.35%
- SMRI 1.41%, better
- DFLV 336
- SMRI 51
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- SMRI 16.4K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- SMRI $47.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | SMRI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F19 |
| Mission | B69 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A76 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B67 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and SMRI are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
SMRIC
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
SMRI Boutique value, old school: 30 to 50 US stocks, equal weighted, screened on cash flow and read through earnings calls. Most of this category buys hundreds of names for pennies. SMRI charges 0.71% to own a few dozen with conviction.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
SMRI The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs SMRI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs SMRI Cost
Overpaying SMRI vs DFLV
$9,425
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
SMRI 0.71%
$13,782
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | SMRI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $1,267 | $884 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $4,824 | $3,333 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $13,782 | $9,425 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.71%SMRI
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
SMRI 51st cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs SMRI Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- SMRI 1.41%, better
- DFLV $0.57
- SMRI $0.67
- DFLV $0.16
- SMRI $0.44
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- SMRI Sep 28, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- SMRI Sep 30, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- SMRI Quarterly
Distribution history
DFLV vs SMRI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%, betterSMRI 16.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterSMRI 1.32
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%SMRI −18.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80SMRI 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.71% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.71% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.71% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.