DFLV ranks 4th and TEQI 22nd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
DFLV vs TEQI
DFLV −0.33pt a year
0.21%0.54%
DFLV 24.0×the volume
658K27.4K
DFLV +3.0pt
+22.7%+19.7%
DFLV vs TEQI Performance
+29.3%+23.1%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- TEQI 0.54%
- DFLV $7.39B
- TEQI $469M
- DFLV +29.3%, better
- TEQI +23.1%
- DFLV 1.35%
- TEQI 1.45%, better
- DFLV 336
- TEQI 109
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- TEQI 27.4K sh
- DFLV $41.80
- TEQI $52.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFLV | TEQI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | C48 |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A76Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B64 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. DFLV and TEQI are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFLVA
TEQIB
In short
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
TEQI A stock-picker's take on value: T. Rowe Price's equity income strategy in ETF form, hunting out-of-favor dividend payers. Roughly 120 names, quarterly payouts, measured against the Russell 1000 Value rather than cloning it.
Stated mandate
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
TEQI The fund seeks a high level of dividend income and long-term capital growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFLV vs TEQI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFLV vs TEQI Cost
Overpaying TEQI vs DFLV
$6,363
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
TEQI 0.54%
$10,720
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFLV | TEQI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $971 | $588 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,724 | $2,233 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $10,720 | $6,363 |
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- 0.54%TEQI
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
TEQI 32nd cheapest of 64 funds
DFLV vs TEQI Dividends
- DFLV 1.35%
- TEQI 1.45%, better
- DFLV $0.57
- TEQI $0.76
- DFLV $0.16
- TEQI $0.19
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- TEQI Sep 28, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- TEQI Sep 30, 2026
- DFLV Quarterly
- TEQI Quarterly
Distribution history
DFLV vs TEQI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFLV 12.3%TEQI 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFLV 1.38, betterTEQI 1.23
- Worst fall
- DFLV −16.8%TEQI −17.8%
- Market sensitivity
- DFLV 0.80TEQI 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.