DFSV ranks 3rd and SIXS 11th of 39 funds in the US Active Small-Cap Category.
DFSV vs SIXS
DFSV −0.20pt a year
0.30%0.50%
DFSV 183.3×the volume
944K5.15K
DFSV +6.7pt
+19.9%+13.2%
DFSV vs SIXS Performance
+27.6%+20.9%
- DFSV 0.30%, better
- SIXS 0.50%
- DFSV $27.8B
- SIXS $145M
- DFSV +27.6%, better
- SIXS +20.9%
- DFSV 1.38%
- SIXS 1.97%, better
- DFSV 1053
- SIXS 85
- DFSV 944K sh, better
- SIXS 5.15K sh
- DFSV $39.41
- SIXS $57.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFSV | SIXS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B64 |
| Mission | B62 | |
| Risk | B59 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | C41 |
| Durability | A97Higher | B66 |
Rank among US Active Small-Cap funds
Same Category. DFSV and SIXS are both graded against the same 39 US Active Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFSVA
SIXSB
In short
DFSV Small-cap value, spread wide: roughly a thousand of the market's cheaper small companies, measured against the Russell 2000 Value Index. A deeper bench than most rivals carry, at a higher price than the plain index funds beside it.
SIXS A Wichita wealth manager's in-house small-cap sleeve, in ETF form. A quant screen cuts the weakest small caps on profitability, growth and debt coverage, then ranks survivors on beta and value.
Stated mandate
DFSV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
SIXS The Fund seeks capital appreciation. Its sub-adviser applies a quantitatively driven strategy emphasizing high-quality small-capitalization securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFSV vs SIXS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFSV vs SIXS Cost
Overpaying SIXS vs DFSV
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFSV 0.30%
$6,149
SIXS 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFSV | SIXS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $900 | $355 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,460 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,979 | $3,830 |
- 0.30%DFSV, cheaper
- 0.50%SIXS
- Middle half of US Active Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.55%
DFSV 4th cheapest of 39 funds
SIXS 17th cheapest of 39 funds
DFSV vs SIXS Dividends
- DFSV 1.38%
- SIXS 1.97%, better
- DFSV $0.54
- SIXS $1.13
- DFSV $0.15
- SIXS $0.09
- DFSV Sep 22, 2026
- SIXS Oct 28, 2026
- DFSV Sep 24, 2026
- SIXS Oct 30, 2026
- DFSV Quarterly
- SIXS Monthly
Distribution history
DFSV vs SIXS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFSV 18.4%SIXS 15.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DFSV 0.84, betterSIXS 0.58
- Worst fall
- DFSV −28.0%SIXS −27.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DFSV 1.04SIXS 0.57
DFSV and SIXS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
