Skip to content
etf.net

DGAP vs MPDB

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - April

DGAPCCboe

m+ DynaBuffer ETF

MPDBBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

MPDB −0.15pt a year

DGAP0.85%MPDB0.70%

Avg volume · 30D

MPDB 5.4×the volume

DGAP1.81KMPDB9.76K

DGAP vs MPDB Performance

Oct 9, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−0.2%DGAP−0.6%MPDB

Oct 9, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. DGAP −0.2%. MPDB −0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%−1.5%−1%Oct 9Oct 23Nov 9
Expense ratio
DGAP 0.85%
MPDB 0.70%, better
Fund size
DGAP $8M
MPDB $11M
Holdings
DGAP 4
MPDB 2
Avg volume (30D)
DGAP 1.81K sh
MPDB 9.76K sh, better
NAV per share
DGAP $31.01
MPDB $24.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DGAP: Cost 24, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings not scored, Durability 31. MPDB: Cost 89, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 16.
Pillar letters and Scores for DGAP, MPDB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDGAPMPDB
Cost30% weightF24A89Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA91HigherB60
Tradability15% weightD31C48Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD31HigherF16

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DGAP and MPDB are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

MPDB ranks 2nd and DGAP 8th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1ATWOXiShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 2BMPDBm+ DynaBuffer ETFScore 67
  3. Rank 3BXTAPInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 7BXUSPInnovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 8CDGAPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - AprilScore 41
  6. Rank 9DUXAPFT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - AprilScore 32

DGAP vs MPDB Holdings

How DGAP and MPDB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: DGAP holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for MPDB.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DGAP and MPDB, widest gap first
CountryMore in DGAPMore in MPDBGap
United StatesMPDB +0.5 points
SwitzerlandDGAP +0.3 points
ChinaDGAP +0.1 points
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DGAP167.1%
  • MPDB102.3%

Securities held

  • DGAP3
  • MPDB2

Asset class

DGAP
Multi-Asset
MPDB
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in DGAP3
  • In both0
  • Only in MPDB2

Only in DGAP

3 securities, 100% of DGAP by weight

  • 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.0798.11%
  • 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 621.3465.06%
  • 2027-04-16 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 710.113.27%

Only in MPDB

2 securities, 100% of MPDB by weight

  • B 11/12/26101.82%
  • Frst Am-Gv Ob-X0.48%

Weight gaps

DGAP and MPDB share no securities.

All 6 DGAP holdings⁠All MPDB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DGAP vs MPDB Cost

Overpaying DGAP vs MPDB

$2,593

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DGAP 0.85%

    $16,199

  • MPDB 0.70%

    $13,606

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DGAP 0.85%
  • MPDB 0.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DGAP $16,199MPDB $13,606

Year by year

YearDGAPMPDBOverpaying
10$1,508$1,250$258
20$5,706$4,760$946
30$16,199$13,606$2,593

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DGAP
  • 0.70%MPDB, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

MPDB 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

DGAP 8th cheapest of 12 funds

DGAP vs MPDB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
DGAP None
MPDB None

Distribution history

DGAPAll DGAP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MPDBAll MPDB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DGAP vs MPDB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DGAP 0.21MPDB 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • DGAPCvsTWOXA

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - April · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MPDBBvsTWOXA

    m+ DynaBuffer ETF · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGAPCvsXTAPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - April · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MPDBBvsXTAPB

    m+ DynaBuffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGAPCvsXTJAB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - April · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MPDBBvsXTJAB

    m+ DynaBuffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.