Skip to content
etf.net

DGLO vs IETC

First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF

DGLOCNasdaq

iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF

IETCACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

IETC −0.52pt a year

DGLO0.70%IETC0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

IETC 31.2×the volume

DGLO1.12KIETC35K

DGLO vs IETC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+19.1%DGLO−4.3%IETC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DGLO +19.1%. IETC −4.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−10%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DGLO 0.70%
IETC 0.18%, better
Fund size
DGLO $5M
IETC $639M
1Y total return
DGLO +19.1%, better
IETC −4.3%
Yield (12M)
DGLO No data
IETC 0.40%
Holdings
DGLO 117
IETC 111
Avg volume (30D)
DGLO 1.12K sh
IETC 35K sh, better
NAV per share
DGLO $23.98
IETC $102.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DGLO: Cost 47, Risk 88, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 87, Durability 28. IETC: Cost 92, Risk 37, Mission 78, Tradability 82, Holdings 37, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for DGLO, IETC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDGLOIETC
Cost30% weightC47A92Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightA88HigherD37
Tradability15% weightD39A82Higher
Holdings10% weightA87HigherD37
Durability5% weightD28A88Higher

Rank among Reshoring & Supply Chain funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DGLO and IETC are both graded against the same 7 Reshoring & Supply Chain funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Reshoring & Supply Chain⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

IETC ranks 1st and DGLO 4th of 7 funds in the Reshoring & Supply Chain Category.

  1. Rank 1AIETCiShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETFScore 71
  2. Rank 2BDRESGMO Domestic Resilience ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BMADEiShares U.S. Manufacturing ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4CDGLOFirst Trust RBA Deglobalization ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 5DWELDTema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DGLOCFirst Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF

IETCAiShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF

In short

DGLO No data

IETC Most reshoring funds buy factories. This one buys the tech behind them: an active BlackRock portfolio that uses geolocation data to favor U.S. tech firms with more capability, revenue and production at home. Running since 2018.

Stated mandate

DGLO No data

IETC The fund seeks long-term growth through actively managed exposure to U.S. technology companies with resilient value chains, domestic capabilities, and a greater proportion of U.S. technological capabilities, revenues, and production.

Why people hold it

DGLO No data

  • IETC At 0.18%, it costs a fraction of the typical fund in this theme, where the median sits at 0.75%. That is unusual pricing for anything actively managed.
  • Actively managed, not index-tracking. BlackRock uses geolocation data and proprietary models to identify U.S. tech companies with a greater share of capabilities, revenue and production onshore.ishares.com
  • The definition of "tech" here is not the standard sector box. A proprietary classification system decides who counts, which can reach names a traditional sector screen files elsewhere.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger implementations in its peer group, and it has been trading since 2018, before reshoring became a crowded fund-marketing category.

Worth knowing

DGLO No data

  • IETC Roughly 100 stocks in one sector, and it sits at the higher-volatility end of what we track. Tech drawdowns land with little inside the portfolio to cushion them.
  • "Tech independence" is BlackRock's own call, set by proprietary models rather than a public index, and iShares notes the classification system may not achieve its intended results.ishares.com
  • Mid-sized and moderately traded rather than a headline-volume ETF, so limit orders are the sensible habit on larger tickets.

Full DGLO profile⁠

Full IETC profile⁠

DGLO vs IETC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DGLO vs IETC Cost

Overpaying DGLO vs IETC

$9,857

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DGLO 0.70%

    $13,606

  • IETC 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DGLO 0.70%
  • IETC 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530DGLO $13,606IETC $3,749

Year by year

YearDGLOIETCOverpaying
10$1,250$328$922
20$4,760$1,281$3,479
30$13,606$3,749$9,857

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%DGLO
  • 0.18%IETC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Reshoring & Supply Chain funds
  • Median 0.70%

IETC cheapest of 7 funds

DGLO 4th cheapest of 7 funds

DGLO vs IETC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DGLO No data
IETC 0.40%
Payout (12M)
DGLO No data
IETC $0.41
Last payment
DGLO $0.02
IETC $0.09
Ex-dividend
DGLO Sep 24, 2026
IETC Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
DGLO Sep 30, 2026
IETC Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
DGLO Quarterly
IETC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

DGLOQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll DGLO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2025 $0.08; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.02; Sep 24, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
IETCQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll IETC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Jun 26, 2018 $0.05; Sep 26, 2018 $0.05; Dec 17, 2018 $0.19; Mar 20, 2019 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.05; Sep 24, 2019 $0.05; Dec 16, 2019 $0.11; Mar 25, 2020 $0.07; Jun 15, 2020 $0.05; Sep 23, 2020 $0.05; Dec 14, 2020 $0.06; Mar 25, 2021 $0.06; Jun 10, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.06; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Mar 24, 2022 $0.06; Jun 9, 2022 $0.05; Sep 26, 2022 $0.09; Dec 13, 2022 $0.17; Mar 23, 2023 $0.13; Jun 7, 2023 $0.07; Sep 26, 2023 $0.16; Dec 20, 2023 $0.13; Mar 21, 2024 $0.08; Jun 11, 2024 $0.09; Sep 25, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Mar 18, 2025 $0.06; Jun 16, 2025 $0.09; Sep 16, 2025 $0.10; Dec 16, 2025 $0.13; Mar 17, 2026 $0.07; Jun 15, 2026 $0.11; Sep 15, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

DGLO vs IETC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DGLO 13.8%since Sep 2025IETC 21.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DGLO 0.78since Sep 2025IETC 0.94
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DGLO −10.5%since Aug 2025IETC −38.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DGLO 0.27IETC 1.24

Popular comparisons

  • DGLOCvsDRESB

    First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF · GMO Domestic Resilience ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • IETCAvsDRESB

    iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF · GMO Domestic Resilience ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGLOCvsMADEB

    First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF · iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • IETCAvsMADEB

    iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF · iShares U.S. Manufacturing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGLOCvsWELDD

    First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF · Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • IETCAvsWELDD

    iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF · Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.