Skip to content
etf.net

DGOC vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October

DGOCDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

DGOC0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 237.0×the volume

DGOC583ZALT138K

DGOC vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.4%DGOC+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DGOC +7.4%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DGOC 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
DGOC $5M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
DGOC +7.4%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
DGOC 4
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
DGOC 583 sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
DGOC $33.10
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DGOC: Cost 11, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 40, Holdings not scored, Durability 26. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for DGOC, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDGOCZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightA77A79Higher
Tradability15% weightC40B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightD26B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DGOC and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and DGOC 71st of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 71DAUGZTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 71DDGOCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - OctoberScore 34
  5. Rank 71DMARZTrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DGOCDFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

DGOC No data

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

DGOC No data

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

DGOC No data

  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

DGOC No data

  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full DGOC profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

DGOC vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DGOC vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying DGOC vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DGOC 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DGOC 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DGOC $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearDGOCZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DGOC
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

DGOC 60th cheapest of 77 funds

DGOC vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DGOC None
ZALT None

Distribution history

DGOCAll DGOC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DGOC vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DGOC 3.8%since Nov 2025ZALT 3.8%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DGOC 0.92since Nov 2025ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DGOC −3.0%since Oct 2025ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DGOC 0.27ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • DGOCDvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGOCDvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DGOCDvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.