JQUA ranks 1st and DGRS 12th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
DGRS vs JQUA
JQUA −0.26pt a year
0.38%0.12%
JQUA 23.3×the volume
27.7K644K
JQUA +6.1pt
+6.5%+12.6%
DGRS vs JQUA Performance
+36.7%+80.7%
- DGRS 0.38%
- JQUA 0.12%, better
- DGRS $382M
- JQUA $9.49B
- DGRS +22.9%, better
- JQUA +22.8%
- DGRS 2.00%, better
- JQUA 1.06%
- DGRS 197
- JQUA 310
- DGRS 27.7K sh
- JQUA 644K sh, better
- DGRS $56.68
- JQUA $73.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRS | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B60 | A80Higher |
| Risk | C44 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | A74 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. DGRS and JQUA are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGRSB
JQUAA
In short
DGRS Most quality-factor ETFs go hunting among mega caps. DGRS runs WisdomTree's quality and growth screens down in U.S. small caps instead, holding roughly 220 dividend payers and distributing monthly.
JQUA Quality investing without the quality price tag. JQUA screens U.S. companies for profitability and strong balance-sheet traits, and charges 0.12%, the lowest fee in the quality-factor group we track.
Stated mandate
DGRS The fund provides exposure to U.S. small-cap companies with dividend-growth potential through quality and growth screens.
JQUA JQUA is designed to provide domestic equity exposure focused on companies with strong quality and profitability characteristics, using a rules-based approach intended to enhance returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRS vs JQUA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRS vs JQUA Cost
Overpaying DGRS vs JQUA
$5,186
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRS 0.38%
$7,706
JQUA 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRS | JQUA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $220 | $468 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $859 | $1,799 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $2,520 | $5,186 |
- 0.38%DGRS
- 0.12%JQUA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
JQUA cheapest of 26 funds
DGRS 13th cheapest of 26 funds
DGRS vs JQUA Dividends
- DGRS 2.00%, better
- JQUA 1.06%
- DGRS $1.17
- JQUA $0.79
- DGRS $0.06
- JQUA $0.18
- DGRS Oct 27, 2026
- JQUA Sep 22, 2026
- DGRS Oct 29, 2026
- JQUA Sep 24, 2026
- DGRS Monthly
- JQUA Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRS vs JQUA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRS
- JQUA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRS 18.7%JQUA 11.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRS 0.68JQUA 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- DGRS −27.8%JQUA −22.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DGRS 1.00JQUA 0.91
DGRS and JQUA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

