Skip to content

DHDG vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF

DHDGCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

DHDG0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 4.6×the volume

DHDG30.2KZALT138K

DHDG vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%DHDG+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DHDG +11.8%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DHDG 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
DHDG $81M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
DHDG +11.8%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
DHDG 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
DHDG 30.2K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
DHDG $37.64
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DHDG: Cost 11, Risk 78, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 61, Durability 59. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for DHDG, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDHDGZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightA78A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB65B65
Holdings10% weightB61A90Higher
Durability5% weightB59B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DHDG and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and DHDG 49th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 44CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 46
  4. Rank 49CDHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 49CFDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DHDGCFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

DHDG Most buffer ETFs lock in one cap for a full year. DHDG re-strikes every quarter against the S&P 500 ETF's price return, and it asks for a deductible: you take the first 2.5% of a drop, the fund absorbs the next 12.5 points.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

DHDG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 4.30% upside cap, while buffering losses in the -2.5% to -15% range during the stated outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • DHDG The buffer skips the first 2.5% of losses and runs down to -15%, spending its protection on a real drawdown rather than the first wobble.ftportfolios.com
  • Quarterly outcome periods reset the terms four times a year, so the cap is struck against current market conditions instead of one date twelve months back.
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF, not a structured note from a bank, and it lands in the upper half of a crowded field of S&P 500 buffer funds.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • DHDG The 0.85% expense ratio sits above cheaper laddered buffer options such as BUFP (0.50%) and IVVM (0.53%).
  • Upside is capped each quarter and the cap is fixed at the period's start. Buy mid-period and your effective cap and remaining buffer differ from the stated terms.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price return, so index dividends sit outside the outcome and this hasn't been an income payer.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full DHDG profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

DHDG vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DHDG vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying DHDG vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DHDG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DHDG 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DHDG $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearDHDGZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DHDG
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

DHDG 60th cheapest of 77 funds

DHDG vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
DHDG None
ZALT None

Distribution history

DHDGAll DHDG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DHDG vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DHDG 6.4%since Nov 2024ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DHDG 1.16since Nov 2024ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DHDG −8.3%since Oct 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DHDG 0.46ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • DHDGCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DHDGCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DHDGCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.