INKM ranks 3rd and DINE 12th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
DINE vs INKM
0.0%by weight
DINE −0.35pt a year
0.15%0.50%
INKM 11.7×the volume
1.13K13.3K
DINE vs INKM Performance
−0.9%−0.4%
- DINE 0.15%, better
- INKM 0.50%
- DINE $3M
- INKM $70M
- DINE
- INKM +7.6%
- DINE
- INKM 4.69%
- DINE 1
- INKM 18
- DINE 1.13K sh
- INKM 13.3K sh, better
- DINE $24.53
- INKM $34.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DINE | INKM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A79 |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | C50 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | D27 | A70Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. DINE and INKM are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DINEC
INKMA
In short
DINE Most income funds hand you ordinary income and a tax bill. DINE routes bond, options, equity and currency income sleeves through year-plus swaps so gains can qualify as long-term capital gains. 0.15% net of a waiver through April 5, 2027.
INKM One ticker, one active manager, and a shopping list that runs from bonds and preferreds to convertibles, global REITs and dividend stocks. INKM has been playing multi-asset income this way since 2012, at half a point of fee.
Stated mandate
DINE DINE seeks capital appreciation through a diversified portfolio of income-based strategies, including fixed income, option-based, equity-income, and currency-income approaches, with tax-management techniques intended to reduce tax impact.
INKM The fund seeks total return by investing primarily in income- and yield-generating assets. It is actively managed and uses tactical allocations across bonds, convertible and preferred securities, global REITs, and domestic and international dividend-focused equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DINE vs INKM Holdings
How DINE and INKM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DINE and 0.0% of INKM.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country84.1%
Sector
No Sector split for DINE.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DINEMore in INKM | DINE | INKM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | DINE +15.9 points | 100.0% | 84.1% |
| Japan | INKM +1.8 points | 0.0% | 1.8% |
| Canada | INKM +1.4 points | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Mexico | INKM +1.3 points | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Australia | INKM +1.2 points | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| China | INKM +1.1 points | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| Switzerland | INKM +1.1 points | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| South Africa | INKM +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Other countries (23) | INKM +7.1 points | 0.0% | 7.1% |
Concentration
- DINE100.0%
- INKM82.6%
- DINE0
- INKM16
Asset class
- DINE
- Equity
- INKM
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in DINE0
- In both0
- Only in INKM16
Only in DINE
0 securities, 0.0% of DINE by weight
Only in INKM
16 securities, 99.6% of INKM by weight
- State Street Spdr Portfolio Lo16.14%
- State Street Spdr S+p Global I10.78%
- State Street Us Equity Premium9.58%
- State Street Spdr Bloomberg Em8.87%
- Schwab Us Dividend Equity Etf7.40%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio S+7.34%
- State Street Spdr Bloomberg Hi5.83%
- State Street Spdr Ice Preferre5.80%
- State Street Blackstone Senior5.79%
- State Street Spdr S+p Internat5.05%
- State Street Spdr Bloomberg Em4.85%
- State Street Spdr Bloomberg Co3.70%
- State Street Spdr Dow Jones Re2.51%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio In2.49%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio Lo2.01%
- State Street Spdr Portfolio In1.49%
Weight gaps
DINE and INKM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DINE vs INKM Cost
Overpaying INKM vs DINE
$6,842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DINE 0.15%
$3,137
INKM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DINE | INKM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $900 | $626 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,460 | $2,389 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $9,979 | $6,842 |
- 0.15%DINE, cheaper
- 0.50%INKM
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
DINE cheapest of 15 funds
INKM 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
DINE vs INKM Dividends
- DINE
- INKM 4.69%
- DINE
- INKM $1.59
- DINE $0.25
- INKM $0.34
- DINE Sep 25, 2026
- INKM Sep 25, 2026
- DINE Sep 30, 2026
- INKM Sep 29, 2026
- DINE Quarterly
- INKM Quarterly
Distribution history
DINE vs INKM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DINE INKM 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DINE INKM 0.92
- Worst fall
- DINE INKM −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DINE 0.21INKM 0.82
DINE and INKM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
