DIVB ranks 3rd and FVD 29th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs FVD
DIVB −0.57pt a year
0.05%0.62%
FVD 1.8×the volume
298K541K
DIVB +7.9pt
+14.5%+6.6%
DIVB vs FVD Performance
+96.4%+38.0%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- FVD 0.62%
- DIVB $2.31B
- FVD $8.08B
- DIVB +40.7%, better
- FVD +15.1%
- DIVB 2.08%
- FVD 2.21%, better
- DIVB 384
- FVD 243
- DIVB 298K sh
- FVD 541K sh, better
- DIVB $71.28
- FVD $50.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | FVD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A74Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B64 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | A88Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and FVD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
FVDC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
FVD A 2003-vintage dividend fund that runs US stocks through Value Line's Safety ranking, putting financial strength ahead of headline yield. Old-school pedigree, and old-school pricing at 0.62%.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
FVD The Fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the price and yield of the Value Line® Dividend Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs FVD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs FVD Cost
Overpaying FVD vs DIVB
$11,119
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
FVD 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | FVD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $1,111 | $1,019 |
| 20 | $360 | $4,246 | $3,886 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $12,179 | $11,119 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.62%FVD
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
FVD 49th cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs FVD Dividends
- DIVB 2.08%
- FVD 2.21%, better
- DIVB $1.48
- FVD $1.12
- DIVB $0.42
- FVD $0.26
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- FVD Sep 24, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- FVD Sep 30, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- FVD Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs FVD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- FVD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%FVD 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterFVD 0.80
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%FVD −16.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88FVD 0.49
DIVB and FVD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
