DOG ranks 1st and EFZ 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs EFZ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 588.4×the volume
4.77M8.11K
EFZ +2.9pt
−10.9%−8.0%
DOG vs EFZ Performance
−20.7%−22.8%
- DOG 0.95%
- EFZ 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- EFZ $10M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- EFZ −8.7%
- DOG 3.15%
- EFZ 3.67%, better
- DOG 3
- EFZ 2
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- EFZ 8.11K sh
- DOG $22.02
- EFZ $23.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | EFZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | C43 | C46Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | C54 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and EFZ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
EFZC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
EFZ Most inverse ETFs aim at the S&P or the Nasdaq. EFZ aims overseas: a straight -1x of the MSCI EAFE Index's daily move, no leverage stacked on top, running since 2007.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
EFZ EFZ seeks daily investment results corresponding to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs EFZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs EFZ Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
EFZ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | EFZ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%EFZ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EFZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs EFZ Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- EFZ 3.67%, better
- DOG $0.69
- EFZ $0.85
- DOG $0.17
- EFZ $0.23
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- EFZ Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- EFZ Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- EFZ Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs EFZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- EFZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterEFZ 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21, betterEFZ −1.42
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterEFZ −45.6%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83EFZ −0.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.