DOG ranks 1st and QID 11th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs QID
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
QID 5.9×the volume
4.77M28.3M
DOG +26.3pt
−10.9%−37.2%
DOG vs QID Performance
−20.7%−78.4%
- DOG 0.95%
- QID 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- QID $311M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- QID −19.2%
- DOG 3.15%
- QID 5.55%, better
- DOG 3
- QID 8
- DOG 4.77M sh
- QID 28.3M sh, better
- DOG $22.02
- QID $15.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | QID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A90 |
| Holdings | C43 | B55Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A71Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and QID are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
QIDB
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
QID One of ProShares' original geared funds, live since 2006: QID aims for two times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resetting every night. Fee is 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
QID The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs QID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs QID Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
QID 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | QID |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%QID
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QID 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs QID Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- QID 5.55%, better
- DOG $0.69
- QID $0.84
- DOG $0.17
- QID $0.17
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- QID Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- QID Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- QID Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs QID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- QID
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterQID 32.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21, betterQID −1.37
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterQID −89.3%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83QID −2.33
DOG and QID in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
