DOG ranks 1st and SZK 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs SZK
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
DOG 995.8×the volume
4.77M4.79K
DOG +6.6pt
−10.9%−17.5%
DOG vs SZK Performance
−20.7%−11.1%
- DOG 0.95%
- SZK 0.95%
- DOG $115M
- SZK $1M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- SZK −28.6%
- DOG 3.15%
- SZK 6.68%, better
- DOG 3
- SZK 1
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- SZK 4.79K sh
- DOG $22.02
- SZK $18.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | SZK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D35 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and SZK are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
SZKC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
SZK The only -2x ETF pointed at a falling consumer staples sector, per ProShares, and it has held that slot since 2007. Soup, soap and razor blades, geared and flipped, reset every single day.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
SZK The fund seeks inverse exposure to the daily performance of the consumer staples sector, aiming to profit when that sector declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs SZK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs SZK Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
SZK 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | SZK |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%DOG
- 0.95%SZK
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SZK 6th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs SZK Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- SZK 6.68%, better
- DOG $0.69
- SZK $1.21
- DOG $0.17
- SZK $0.83
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- SZK Sep 23, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- SZK Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- SZK Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs SZK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DOG
- SZK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterSZK 25.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21SZK −0.70, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%, betterSZK −43.0%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83SZK −0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.