DOG ranks 1st and TSXD 52nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs TSXD
DOG −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
DOG 84.9×the volume
4.77M56.2K
DOG vs TSXD Performance
−4.9%−63.4%
- DOG 0.95%, better
- TSXD 0.99%
- DOG $115M
- TSXD $1M
- DOG −4.9%, better
- TSXD −63.4%
- DOG 3.15%
- TSXD
- DOG 3
- TSXD 3
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- TSXD 56.2K sh
- DOG $22.02
- TSXD $5.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | TSXD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97 | |
| Risk | B65Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | F15 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and TSXD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
TSXDD
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
TSXD The inverse half of Direxion's Titans line: TSXD aims for -200% of the daily move in an equal-weight basket of the five biggest semiconductor names. Narrower than shorting the whole sector, broader than betting against one chip stock.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
TSXD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to -200% of the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Top 5 Equal Weight Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs TSXD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs TSXD Cost
Overpaying TSXD vs DOG
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
TSXD 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | TSXD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%DOG, cheaper
- 0.99%TSXD
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TSXD 49th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs TSXD Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- TSXD
- DOG $0.69
- TSXD
- DOG $0.17
- TSXD $0.06
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- TSXD Sep 22, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- TSXD Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- TSXD Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs TSXD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%TSXD 74.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21TSXD −0.97
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%TSXD −81.1%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83TSXD −3.62
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.