DOG ranks 1st and TTXD 52nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs TTXD
DOG −0.07pt a year
0.95%1.02%
DOG 432.9×the volume
5.25M12.1K
DOG vs TTXD Performance
−7.4%−41.2%
- DOG 0.95%, better
- TTXD 1.02%
- DOG $123M
- TTXD $1M
- DOG −7.4%, better
- TTXD −41.2%
- DOG 3.19%
- TTXD
- DOG 3
- TTXD 3
- DOG 5.25M sh, better
- TTXD 12.1K sh
- DOG $22.21
- TTXD $15.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | TTXD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A70Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | F22 |
| Holdings | C44 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | F12 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and TTXD are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
TTXDD
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
TTXD Most inverse tech funds short a whole index. TTXD points at five: the largest US information technology stocks, equal weighted, at 200% of their inverse move each day. A scalpel where the shelf mostly stocks blunt instruments.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
TTXD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the inverse performance of the S&P 500 Information Technology (Sector) Top 5 Equal Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs TTXD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs TTXD Cost
Overpaying TTXD vs DOG
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
TTXD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | TTXD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,797 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,746 | $424 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,012 | $1,143 |
- 0.95%DOG, cheaper
- 1.02%TTXD
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
TTXD 51st cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs TTXD Dividends
- DOG 3.19%
- TTXD
- DOG $0.69
- TTXD
- DOG $0.17
- TTXD $0.24
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- TTXD Sep 22, 2026
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- TTXD Sep 29, 2026
- DOG Quarterly
- TTXD Quarterly
Distribution history
DOG vs TTXD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%TTXD 63.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21TTXD −0.47
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%TTXD −72.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83TTXD −3.76
DOG and TTXD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
