Skip to content
etf.net

DRSK vs UCBG

Aptus Defined Risk ETF

DRSKCCboe

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

UCBG −0.73pt a year

DRSK0.79%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 24.8×the volume

DRSK167KUCBG4.15M

DRSK vs UCBG Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.4%DRSK−0.9%UCBG

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. DRSK +0.4%. UCBG −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−0.5%0%1%1.5%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
DRSK 0.79%
UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size
DRSK $1.4B
UCBG $2.52B
1Y total return
DRSK −4.1%
UCBG No data
Yield (12M)
DRSK 4.02%
UCBG No data
Holdings
DRSK 24
UCBG 868
Avg volume (30D)
DRSK 167K sh
UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
DRSK $27.23
UCBG $50.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DRSK: Cost 32, Risk 52, Mission 67, Tradability 72, Holdings 54, Durability 84. UCBG: Cost 100, Risk not scored, Mission 99, Tradability 99, Holdings 79, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for DRSK, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDRSKUCBG
Cost30% weightD32A100Higher
Mission25% weightB67A99Higher
Risk15% weightC52Not scored
Tradability15% weightA72A99Higher
Holdings10% weightC54A79Higher
Durability5% weightA84HigherB66

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DRSK and UCBG are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and DRSK 18th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 17BNDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 18CDRSKAptus Defined Risk ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 19CPCPPPorter & Company Permanent Portfolio Index ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DRSKCAptus Defined Risk ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

DRSK Mostly a laddered pile of investment-grade corporate bonds, with the last slice in long call options on big US stocks. Losses on that options sleeve are limited to what was paid for them.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

DRSK The Fund seeks current income and capital appreciation through a hybrid fixed-income and equity strategy. It generally obtains 90%-95% exposure to investment-grade corporate bonds and uses the remainder for large-capitalization U.S. stocks while seeking to limit downside risk.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

  • DRSK Documented build: 90% to 95% exposure to investment-grade corporate bonds, remainder in large-cap US equity exposure chosen to limit downside risk.sec.gov
  • The bond core is a ladder of target-maturity bond funds maturing annually over the next decade, so rungs roll off and reprice as rates move.sec.gov
  • Running since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it was doing option-based equity exposure years before the payoff-shaping ETF crowd arrived.
  • Compact and readable: a couple dozen positions, mainly bond funds plus the option line items.

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

  • DRSK Costs 0.79%, above the category median of 37 funds. Plain allocation index peers run cheaper: IRTR at 0.08%, AOA at 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026.
  • Options expire. In a flat or falling equity market the premium paid can be lost in full, leaving the bond sleeve to carry the fund.sec.gov
  • Its stated yardstick is the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, so judge it against bonds, not a stock-heavy allocation fund.

UCBG No data

Full DRSK profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

DRSK vs UCBG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DRSK vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying DRSK vs UCBG

$13,904

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DRSK 0.79%

    $15,174

  • UCBG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DRSK 0.79%
  • UCBG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DRSK $15,174UCBG $1,270

Year by year

YearDRSKUCBGOverpaying
10$1,405$110$1,295
20$5,331$432$4,899
30$15,174$1,270$13,904

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DRSK
  • 0.06%UCBG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

UCBG cheapest of 37 funds

DRSK 25th cheapest of 37 funds

DRSK vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DRSK 4.02%
UCBG No data
Payout (12M)
DRSK $1.10
UCBG No data
Last payment
DRSK $0.30
UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend
DRSK Sep 29, 2026
UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
DRSK Sep 30, 2026
UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
DRSK Quarterly
UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

DRSKQuarterly · 35 paymentsAll DRSK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 18, 2018 $0.04; Dec 28, 2018 $0.62; Mar 12, 2019 $0.08; Jun 11, 2019 $0.13; Sep 17, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.51; Mar 17, 2020 $0.07; Jun 16, 2020 $0.06; Sep 15, 2020 $0.11; Nov 18, 2020 $1.31; Dec 29, 2020 $0.11; Mar 16, 2021 $0.04; Jun 15, 2021 $0.04; Sep 14, 2021 $0.06; Nov 17, 2021 $0.53; Dec 29, 2021 $0.08; Mar 15, 2022 $0.01; Jun 14, 2022 $0.07; Sep 13, 2022 $0.16; Dec 28, 2022 $0.25; Mar 29, 2023 $0.13; Jun 28, 2023 $0.23; Sep 27, 2023 $0.25; Dec 27, 2023 $0.29; Mar 26, 2024 $0.16; Jun 27, 2024 $0.22; Sep 27, 2024 $0.21; Dec 30, 2024 $0.30; Mar 28, 2025 $0.20; Jun 27, 2025 $0.28; Sep 29, 2025 $0.26; Dec 30, 2025 $0.30; Mar 30, 2026 $0.22; Jun 29, 2026 $0.27; Sep 29, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD
UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

DRSK vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DRSK 8.4%UCBG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DRSK 0.68UCBG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DRSK −19.9%UCBG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DRSK 1.22UCBG 0.00

DRSK and UCBG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • DRSKCvsAOAA

    Aptus Defined Risk ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsAOAA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DRSKCvsIRTRA

    Aptus Defined Risk ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsIRTRA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DRSKCvsINCEA

    Aptus Defined Risk ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UCBGAvsINCEA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.