DYNF ranks 4th and SECT 56th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
DYNF vs SECT
DYNF −0.43pt a year
0.26%0.69%
DYNF 19.2×the volume
2.25M117K
DYNF +2.8pt
+13.8%+11.0%
DYNF vs SECT Performance
+90.9%+68.8%
- DYNF 0.26%, better
- SECT 0.69%
- DYNF $41.8B
- SECT $2.86B
- DYNF +11.6%, better
- SECT +10.4%
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- SECT 0.70%
- DYNF 264
- SECT 11
- DYNF 2.25M sh, better
- SECT 117K sh
- DYNF $67.32
- SECT $70.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DYNF | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A99Higher | A82 |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D28 |
| Durability | A97Higher | A85 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. DYNF and SECT are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DYNFA
SECTC
In short
DYNF Most factor funds make you pick a lane: value, momentum, quality. DYNF rotates across five styles instead, letting a factor model decide which one leads, and charges an index-fund-ish 0.26% to do it.
SECT Rather than picking stocks, SECT rents whole sectors through sector ETFs, tilting toward the ones its managers judge undervalued. The stated aim: outperform the S&P 500 in rising markets while limiting losses when markets decline.
Stated mandate
DYNF The Fund seeks to outperform the U.S. equity market through diversified, tactical exposure to style factors using a factor rotation model.
SECT The Fund seeks to outperform the S&P 500 during rising markets while limiting losses when markets decline.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DYNF vs SECT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DYNF vs SECT Cost
Overpaying SECT vs DYNF
$8,071
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DYNF 0.26%
$5,358
SECT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DYNF | SECT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $1,232 | $759 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $4,697 | $2,859 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $13,429 | $8,071 |
- 0.26%DYNF, cheaper
- 0.69%SECT
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DYNF 18th cheapest of 121 funds
SECT 62nd cheapest of 121 funds
DYNF vs SECT Dividends
- DYNF 0.84%, better
- SECT 0.70%
- DYNF $0.56
- SECT $0.49
- DYNF $0.14
- SECT $0.08
- DYNF Sep 15, 2026
- SECT Sep 24, 2026
- DYNF Sep 18, 2026
- SECT Sep 29, 2026
- DYNF Quarterly
- SECT Quarterly
Distribution history
DYNF vs SECT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DYNF
- SECT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DYNF 13.1%, betterSECT 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DYNF 1.55, betterSECT 1.13
- Worst fall
- DYNF −26.9%SECT −21.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DYNF 1.02SECT 0.97
DYNF and SECT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

