ZALT ranks 1st and EALT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
EALT vs ZALT
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.69%0.69%
ZALT 6.0×the volume
22.5K135K
EALT +1.8pt
+11.8%+10.0%
EALT vs ZALT Performance
+4.1%+7.7%
- EALT 0.69%
- ZALT 0.69%
- EALT $183M
- ZALT $835M
- EALT +4.1%
- ZALT +7.7%, better
- EALT 4
- ZALT 503
- EALT 22.5K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- EALT $35.54
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EALT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A82 |
| Mission | A84Higher | A80 |
| Risk | D30 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B61 | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. EALT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EALTB
ZALTA
In short
EALT Most buffer funds cushion your first dollar of loss. EALT skips that, absorbing the 5% to 15% slice of an S&P 500 ETF's decline instead, and resetting every three months. You wear the first 5%, and the upside is capped.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
EALT The fund seeks to track the return of an S&P 500 ETF, subject to a cap, while providing downside protection within the 5% to 15% loss range during each three-month outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EALT vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EALT vs ZALT Cost
Same expense ratio
$13,429
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EALT 0.69%
$13,429
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EALT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,232 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $4,697 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $13,429 |
- 0.69%EALT
- 0.69%ZALT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
EALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
EALT vs ZALT Dividends
- EALT None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
EALT vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EALT 8.8%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EALT 0.92ZALT 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- EALT −14.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EALT 0.67ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.