Skip to content

EALT vs ZALT

Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF

EALTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

EALT0.69%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 6.0×the volume

EALT22.5KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

EALT +1.8pt

EALT+11.8%ZALT+10.0%

EALT vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+4.1%EALT+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. EALT +4.1%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EALT 0.69%
ZALT 0.69%
Fund size
EALT $183M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
EALT +4.1%
ZALT +7.7%, better
Holdings
EALT 4
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
EALT 22.5K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
EALT $35.54
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EALT: Cost 82, Risk 30, Mission 84, Tradability 47, Holdings 50, Durability 61. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for EALT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEALTZALT
Cost30% weightA82A82
Mission25% weightA84HigherA80
Risk15% weightD30A73Higher
Tradability15% weightC47B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC50A89Higher
Durability5% weightB61B61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EALT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and EALT 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 17BDECTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Dec ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 18BEALTInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 18BJANTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jan ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EALTBInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

EALT Most buffer funds cushion your first dollar of loss. EALT skips that, absorbing the 5% to 15% slice of an S&P 500 ETF's decline instead, and resetting every three months. You wear the first 5%, and the upside is capped.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

EALT The fund seeks to track the return of an S&P 500 ETF, subject to a cap, while providing downside protection within the 5% to 15% loss range during each three-month outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • EALT A 10-point protected band placed over the 5% to 15% loss zone, the ordinary-pullback range, referenced to a plain S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
  • Outcome periods run three months, so buffer and cap reset four times a year rather than once. Less waiting to get back to fresh terms.
  • 0.69% a year undercuts the typical shallow-buffer fund at 0.79%, and matches Innovator's own quarterly first-dollar sibling ZALT.
  • Live since 2023 and one of the stronger builds in a shallow-buffer field of 50-plus competing funds.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • EALT The first 5% of a decline is yours, and so is anything below 15%. This is a band of protection, not a floor.
  • Upside is capped, with a new cap set each three-month period. Buy mid-period and your buffer and cap differ from the stated terms.
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the category's heavyweights. The structure targets price outcomes, not income.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full EALT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

EALT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EALT vs ZALT Cost

Same expense ratio

$13,429

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EALT 0.69%

    $13,429

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EALT 0.69%
  • ZALT 0.69%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530EALT $13,429ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearEALTZALT
10$1,232$1,232
20$4,697$4,697
30$13,429$13,429

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%EALT
  • 0.69%ZALT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

EALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

EALT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
EALT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

EALTAll EALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EALT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EALT 8.8%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EALT 0.92ZALT 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EALT −14.8%since Oct 2023ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EALT 0.67ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • EALTBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EALTBvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EALTBvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.