EFAV ranks 1st and GRIN 14th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
EFAV vs GRIN
EFAV −0.36pt a year
0.20%0.56%
EFAV 14.8×the volume
510K34.4K
EFAV vs GRIN Performance
+17.8%+12.7%
- EFAV 0.20%, better
- GRIN 0.56%
- EFAV $5.53B
- GRIN $346M
- EFAV +17.8%, better
- GRIN +12.7%
- EFAV 2.97%, better
- GRIN 0.67%
- EFAV 283
- GRIN 103
- EFAV 510K sh, better
- GRIN 34.4K sh
- EFAV $96.22
- GRIN $31.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAV | GRIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D25 |
| Mission | B56 | A71Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A83Higher | F20 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. EFAV and GRIN are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAVA
GRIND
In short
EFAV The 2011 original for overseas min vol: roughly 300 developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, picked for lower-volatility traits, at 0.20% a year. One of the strongest builds in its international factor group.
GRIN Free-cash-flow funds abroad usually hunt cheap cash cows. GRIN runs the math the other way: non-US developed large caps ranked on cash generated per dollar of invested capital, then screened for sales and profit growth.
Stated mandate
EFAV The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada that have lower-volatility characteristics.
GRIN The fund is designed to provide exposure to equity securities of growth companies in non-U.S. developed markets, using free-cash-flow-oriented profitability measures in the index methodology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAV vs GRIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAV vs GRIN Cost
Overpaying GRIN vs EFAV
$6,933
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAV 0.20%
$4,155
GRIN 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAV | GRIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,006 | $641 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,855 | $2,434 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $11,088 | $6,933 |
- 0.20%EFAV, cheaper
- 0.56%GRIN
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
EFAV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
GRIN 12th cheapest of 15 funds
EFAV vs GRIN Dividends
- EFAV 2.97%, better
- GRIN 0.67%
- EFAV $2.86
- GRIN $0.21
- EFAV $1.68
- GRIN $0.05
- EFAV Jun 15, 2026
- GRIN Oct 8, 2026
- EFAV Jun 18, 2026
- GRIN Oct 9, 2026
- EFAV Twice a year
- GRIN Monthly
Distribution history
EFAV vs GRIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAV 10.5%GRIN 19.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAV 1.24GRIN 0.63
- Worst fall
- EFAV −26.0%GRIN −14.3%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAV 0.48GRIN 1.14
EFAV and GRIN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
