EFAV ranks 1st and IMTM 7th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
EFAV vs IMTM
EFAV −0.10pt a year
0.20%0.30%
EFAV 1.4×the volume
510K354K
IMTM +3.0pt
+7.3%+10.3%
EFAV vs IMTM Performance
+45.5%+53.1%
- EFAV 0.20%, better
- IMTM 0.30%
- EFAV $5.53B
- IMTM $4.17B
- EFAV +17.8%, better
- IMTM +12.1%
- EFAV 2.97%
- IMTM 4.56%, better
- EFAV 283
- IMTM 314
- EFAV 510K sh, better
- IMTM 354K sh
- EFAV $96.22
- IMTM $50.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAV | IMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | B61 |
| Mission | B56 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | A72 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C50 |
| Durability | A83Higher | A76 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. EFAV and IMTM are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAVA
IMTMB
In short
EFAV The 2011 original for overseas min vol: roughly 300 developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, picked for lower-volatility traits, at 0.20% a year. One of the strongest builds in its international factor group.
IMTM Momentum investing usually stops at the US border. IMTM runs the same idea across developed markets outside America, holding roughly 300 stocks picked for strong price momentum and reshuffling as leadership changes hands.
Stated mandate
EFAV The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada that have lower-volatility characteristics.
IMTM The fund seeks to follow an index of developed-market international equities selected for relatively strong price momentum.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAV vs IMTM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAV vs IMTM Cost
Overpaying IMTM vs EFAV
$1,994
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAV 0.20%
$4,155
IMTM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAV | IMTM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $545 | $180 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $2,113 | $692 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $6,149 | $1,994 |
- 0.20%EFAV, cheaper
- 0.30%IMTM
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
EFAV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
IMTM 6th cheapest of 15 funds
EFAV vs IMTM Dividends
- EFAV 2.97%
- IMTM 4.56%, better
- EFAV $2.86
- IMTM $2.32
- EFAV $1.68
- IMTM $0.60
- EFAV Jun 15, 2026
- IMTM Jun 15, 2026
- EFAV Jun 18, 2026
- IMTM Jun 18, 2026
- EFAV Twice a year
- IMTM Twice a year
Distribution history
EFAV vs IMTM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAV
- IMTM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAV 10.5%, betterIMTM 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAV 1.24IMTM 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- EFAV −26.0%, betterIMTM −30.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAV 0.48IMTM 0.81
EFAV and IMTM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

