EFO ranks 1st and ULE 2nd of 4 funds in the 2x/3x Long Developed International Category.
EFO vs ULE
39.8%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
ULE 1.05×the volume
4.29K4.5K
EFO +12.8pt
+10.2%−2.6%
EFO vs ULE Performance
+41.5%−14.9%
- EFO 0.95%
- ULE 0.95%
- EFO $25M
- ULE $4M
- EFO +17.8%, better
- ULE −7.2%
- EFO 1.60%
- ULE
- EFO 2
- ULE 1
- EFO 4.29K sh
- ULE 4.5K sh, better
- EFO $70.29
- ULE $11.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFO | ULE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | D36 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B67Higher | B55 |
Rank among 2x/3x Long Developed International funds
Same Category. EFO and ULE are both graded against the same 4 2x/3x Long Developed International funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFOC
ULEC
In short
EFO The only ETF that targets 2x the daily move of the MSCI EAFE Index: one ticker for a magnified bet on developed markets outside the US and Canada. Running since 2009, with a daily reset that makes it a short-leash tool.
ULE A rare thing: a plain ETF ticker that aims to deliver twice the daily move of the euro against the dollar. Currency leverage without a futures account, running since 2008.
Stated mandate
EFO EFO seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index.
ULE The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFO vs ULE Holdings
How EFO and ULE differ
39.8%
Shared holdings make up 100% of ULE and 39.8% of EFO.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings39.8%
Sector
No Sector split for ULE.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ULE.
Concentration
- EFO100.0%
- ULE100.0%
- EFO1
- ULE0
Asset class
- EFO
- Equity
- ULE
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in EFO1
- In both0
- Only in ULE0
Only in EFO
1 security, 60.2% of EFO by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf60.19%
Only in ULE
0 securities, 0.0% of ULE by weight
Weight gaps
EFO and ULE share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFO vs ULE Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFO 0.95%
$17,869
ULE 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFO | ULE |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EFO
- 0.95%ULE
EFO vs ULE Dividends
- EFO 1.60%
- ULE
- EFO $1.13
- ULE None
- EFO $0.28
- ULE
- EFO Sep 23, 2026
- ULE
- EFO Sep 29, 2026
- ULE
- EFO Quarterly
- ULE
Distribution history
EFO vs ULE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFO
- ULE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFO 23.8%ULE 14.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFO 1.05, betterULE −0.06
- Worst fall
- EFO −53.3%ULE −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFO 1.27ULE 0.33
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.