TCAL ranks 1st and EGGQ 31st of 50 funds in the Active Option Income Category.
EGGQ vs TCAL
TCAL −0.59pt a year
0.93%0.34%
TCAL 15.7×the volume
5.05K79.2K
EGGQ vs TCAL Performance
−14.3%+10.8%
- EGGQ 0.93%
- TCAL 0.34%, better
- EGGQ $60M
- TCAL $321M
- EGGQ −14.3%
- TCAL +10.8%, better
- EGGQ 11.32%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- EGGQ 39
- TCAL 106
- EGGQ 5.05K sh
- TCAL 79.2K sh, better
- EGGQ $35.69
- TCAL $23.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EGGQ | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F17 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A84Higher |
Rank among Active Option Income funds
Same Category. EGGQ and TCAL are both graded against the same 50 Active Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EGGQC
TCALA
In short
EGGQ Most options-income funds lead with yield. EGGQ flips the order: growth first, income second, with an active manager buying US large caps directly or through options, and paying monthly. Fee: 0.93% net of a waiver through March 30, 2027.
TCAL An active stock picker's take on the covered-call trade: roughly 70 hand-chosen holdings, calls written on top, cash paid out monthly, all for 0.34% a year.
Stated mandate
EGGQ The Fund seeks long-term growth and, secondarily, current income. It actively selects U.S.-listed large-cap companies, investing directly or synthetically through options; its option strategies seek income and may limit upside, while cash or Treasuries may comprise up to 20% of assets.
TCAL The fund seeks regular distributions while aiming to preserve capital and potentially achieve capital appreciation. It invests in equities and writes covered calls to generate cash flow alongside dividends.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EGGQ vs TCAL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EGGQ vs TCAL Cost
Overpaying EGGQ vs TCAL
$10,607
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EGGQ 0.93%
$17,539
TCAL 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EGGQ | TCAL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $616 | $1,028 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $2,386 | $3,813 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $6,932 | $10,607 |
- 0.93%EGGQ
- 0.34%TCAL, cheaper
- Middle half of Active Option Income funds
- Median 0.95%
TCAL 2nd cheapest of 50 funds
EGGQ 22nd cheapest of 50 funds
EGGQ vs TCAL Dividends
- EGGQ 11.32%
- TCAL 11.55%, better
- EGGQ $4.26
- TCAL $2.71
- EGGQ $0.40
- TCAL $0.26
- EGGQ Oct 29, 2026
- TCAL Oct 30, 2026
- EGGQ Oct 30, 2026
- TCAL Nov 3, 2026
- EGGQ Monthly
- TCAL Monthly
Distribution history
EGGQ vs TCAL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EGGQ 37.9%TCAL 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EGGQ 0.41TCAL 0.24
- Worst fall
- EGGQ −46.6%TCAL −7.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EGGQ 2.09TCAL 0.20
EGGQ and TCAL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.48%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
