JEMA ranks 4th and EMKT 16th of 27 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Equity Category.
EMKT vs JEMA
JEMA −0.41pt a year
0.74%0.33%
JEMA 11.6×the volume
12.7K148K
EMKT vs JEMA Performance
+16.9%+18.1%
- EMKT 0.74%
- JEMA 0.33%, better
- EMKT $164M
- JEMA $1.59B
- EMKT +16.9%
- JEMA +18.1%, better
- EMKT
- JEMA 2.54%
- EMKT 74
- JEMA 485
- EMKT 12.7K sh
- JEMA 148K sh, better
- EMKT $27.99
- JEMA $54.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMKT | JEMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A94Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C47 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C42 | |
| Durability | A73 | A89Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
Same Category. EMKT and JEMA are both graded against the same 27 Emerging Markets Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMKTC
JEMAA
In short
EMKT Old-school value hunting in emerging markets: Lazard's managers buy non-US companies they read as cheap on earnings, cash flow, or asset values. A human-picked portfolio with roots in 2013, not an index clone.
JEMA Active emerging-markets management priced like an index fund: J.P. Morgan blends its own country, region and style EM strategies into one roughly 500-stock portfolio built to keep the MSCI EM index's sector and country risk shape.
Stated mandate
EMKT The Portfolio seeks long-term capital appreciation. It primarily invests in equity securities, principally common stocks, of non-U.S. companies whose main activities are in emerging markets and that the manager considers undervalued based on earnings, cash flow, or asset values.
JEMA Seeks long-term capital appreciation through a portfolio of emerging-market equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMKT vs JEMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMKT vs JEMA Cost
Overpaying EMKT vs JEMA
$7,570
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMKT 0.74%
$14,307
JEMA 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMKT | JEMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $598 | $721 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $2,318 | $2,697 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $6,737 | $7,570 |
- 0.74%EMKT
- 0.33%JEMA, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
- Median 0.65%
JEMA cheapest of 27 funds
EMKT 19th cheapest of 27 funds
EMKT vs JEMA Dividends
- EMKT
- JEMA 2.54%
- EMKT
- JEMA $1.43
- EMKT $0.14
- JEMA $1.43
- EMKT Jun 18, 2026
- JEMA Dec 16, 2025
- EMKT Jun 22, 2026
- JEMA Dec 18, 2025
- EMKT Irregular
- JEMA Annual
Distribution history
EMKT vs JEMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMKT 24.9%JEMA 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EMKT 0.44JEMA 1.03
- Worst fall
- EMKT −16.9%JEMA −36.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EMKT 1.09JEMA 1.08
EMKT and JEMA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





