ESGU ranks 4th and NULG 29th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
ESGU vs NULG
23.5%by weight
ESGU −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.26%
ESGU 5.0×the volume
409K82.6K
ESGU +1.6pt
+10.4%+8.8%
ESGU vs NULG Performance
+63.8%+52.3%
- ESGU 0.15%, better
- NULG 0.26%
- ESGU $17.3B
- NULG $2.76B
- ESGU +13.1%, better
- NULG +7.7%
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- NULG 0.11%
- ESGU 271
- NULG 78
- ESGU 409K sh, better
- NULG 82.6K sh
- ESGU $160.68
- NULG $102.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ESGU | NULG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A84 |
| Risk | C53Higher | F16 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | A72 |
| Holdings | B59Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A80 |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. ESGU and NULG are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ESGUA
NULGB
In short
ESGU Screening out companies is easy; keeping the market's shape while you do it is the hard part. ESGU's index optimizes toward stronger ESG characteristics while targeting risk and return similar to the broad MSCI USA Index.
NULG Most ESG funds hand you the whole US market and call it a day. NULG picks a lane: a compact bench of large-cap growth names run through TIAA's own ESG screen, so the values filter and the style tilt arrive in one ticker.
Stated mandate
ESGU Seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap U.S. companies selected for favorable environmental, social and governance (ESG) characteristics while seeking risk/return similar to the MSCI USA Index.
NULG The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index, which holds ESG-screened equity securities issued by large-capitalization companies listed on U.S. exchanges.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ESGU vs NULG Holdings
How ESGU and NULG differ
23.5%
Shared holdings make up 85.2% of NULG and 23.9% of ESGU.
Level by level
- Holdings23.5%
- Sector80.5%
- Country98.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in ESGUMore in NULG | Gap | ESGU | NULG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | NULG +11.4 points | 36.2% | 47.6% | |
| Financials | ESGU +6.9 points | 12.5% | 5.6% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | NULG +5.0 points | 8.7% | 13.7% | |
| Consumer Staples | ESGU +3.9 points | 4.8% | 0.9% | |
| Energy | ESGU +3.7 points | 3.7% | 0.0% | |
| Communication | ESGU +2.7 points | 8.2% | 5.5% | |
| Utilities | ESGU +1.9 points | 1.9% | 0.0% | |
| Industrials | NULG +1.9 points | 8.3% | 10.2% | |
| Real Estate | NULG +0.9 points | 2.2% | 3.1% | |
| Materials | NULG +0.4 points | 2.1% | 2.5% | |
| Health Care | ESGU +0.3 points | 11.3% | 11.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ESGUMore in NULG | Gap | ESGU | NULG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | ESGU +1.6 points | 99.8% | 98.2% | |
| Brazil | NULG +1.4 points | 0.1% | 1.5% | |
| Other countries (2) | NULG +0.2 points | 0.1% | 0.3% |
Concentration
- ESGU36.5%
- NULG43.2%
- ESGU268
- NULG76
Asset class
- ESGU
- Stocks
- NULG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in ESGU213
- In both55
- Only in NULG21
Only in ESGU
213 securities, 75.9% of ESGU by weight
- Apple7.82%
- Microsoft5.97%
- Amazon.com Inc3.87%
- Alphabet Class C3.03%
- Meta Platforms Class A1.95%
- Alphabet Class A1.66%
- Tesla Inc1.59%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co1.37%
- Micron Technology1.20%
- AbbVie0.90%
- Johnson & Johnson0.84%
- Mastercard Class A0.78%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp0.74%
- Home Depot0.71%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.70%
- Procter & Gamble0.69%
- Coca-Cola0.64%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.63%
- Hartford Insurance Group0.62%
- Verizon Communications Inc0.57%
- Merck & Co Inc0.54%
- Goldman Sachs Group0.52%
- Ge Aerospace0.50%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B0.49%
- Nisource0.48%
- Rtx0.47%
- UnitedHealth Group0.46%
- Palantir Technologies Class A0.45%
- Morgan Stanley0.45%
- Bank of New York Mellon Corp0.44%
- Nextera Energy0.43%
- Gilead Sciences0.43%
- Automatic Data Processing Inc0.42%
- Lowes Companies Inc0.42%
- Linde PLC0.42%
- S&P Global0.41%
- American Express0.41%
- American Tower Reit0.40%
- Steris0.40%
- Intel Corporation0.40%
- Texas Instrument0.39%
- International Business Machines Co0.39%
- Honeywell International Inc0.37%
- Bank of America0.37%
- Stryker0.36%
- Metlife0.36%
- Accenture PLC Class A0.36%
- Amgen Inc0.36%
- Exelon Corp0.36%
- Crh Public Limited PLC0.34%
Only in NULG
21 securities, 14.5% of NULG by weight
- Tjx Companies, Inc.1.68%
- Ross Stores, Inc.1.62%
- Ebay, Inc.1.56%
- Carvana Co1.06%
- Expedia Group Inc0.98%
- Live Nation Entertainment0.93%
- Ulta Beauty Inc0.92%
- Estee Lauder Cos. Class A0.89%
- Liberty Media Corp-C0.77%
- Autozone, Inc.0.73%
- Roblox Corp0.66%
- Samsara Inc0.46%
- Verisign Inc.0.43%
- Reddit Inc0.38%
- Nvent Electric PLC0.34%
- Lpl Financial Holdings In0.27%
- O'reilly Automotive, Inc.0.22%
- Echostar Corp0.21%
- United Therapeutics Corp0.20%
- Ast Spacemobile Inc0.19%
- Carpenter Technology Corp<0.01%
Weight gaps
All 55 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in ESGUMore in NULG | Gap | ESGU | NULG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | NULG +8.57 points | 6.80% | 15.37% | |
| Eli Lilly | NULG +3.49 points | 1.67% | 5.16% | |
| Broadcom Inc | NULG +3.16 points | 2.12% | 5.28% | |
| Visa Class A | NULG +2.61 points | 1.39% | 4.00% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | NULG +2.45 points | 1.18% | 3.63% | |
| Welltower | NULG +1.80 points | 0.25% | 2.05% | |
| Netflix | NULG +1.66 points | 0.34% | 2.00% | |
| Applovin Class A | NULG +1.63 points | 0.13% | 1.76% | |
| Palo Alto Networks | NULG +1.61 points | 0.48% | 2.09% | |
| Moodys Corp | NULG +1.51 points | 0.17% | 1.68% | |
| Idexx Laboratories | NULG +1.38 points | 0.38% | 1.76% | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | NULG +1.35 points | 0.28% | 1.63% | |
| Autodesk | NULG +1.33 points | 0.27% | 1.60% | |
| Applied Material Inc | NULG +1.31 points | 0.51% | 1.82% | |
| Booking Holdings | NULG +1.29 points | 0.19% | 1.48% | |
| Lam Research | NULG +1.28 points | 0.48% | 1.76% | |
| Cadence Design Systems | NULG +1.28 points | 0.26% | 1.54% | |
| Caterpillar Inc | NULG +1.27 points | 0.44% | 1.71% | |
| Fortinet | NULG +1.23 points | 0.11% | 1.34% | |
| Mercadolibre | NULG +1.21 points | 0.13% | 1.34% | |
| Sherwin Williams | NULG +1.16 points | 0.17% | 1.33% | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill | NULG +1.14 points | 0.17% | 1.31% | |
| Trane Technologies PLC | NULG +1.13 points | 0.35% | 1.48% | |
| Howmet Aerospace | NULG +1.13 points | 0.17% | 1.30% | |
| Eaton PLC | NULG +1.08 points | 0.20% | 1.28% | |
| Analog Devices | NULG +1.07 points | 0.29% | 1.36% | |
| Resmed | NULG +1.01 points | 0.11% | 1.12% | |
| Servicenow | NULG +1.02 points | 0.27% | 1.29% | |
| Datadog Inc Class A | NULG +0.98 points | 0.08% | 1.06% | |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | NULG +0.95 points | 0.17% | 1.12% | |
| Cummins Inc | NULG +0.93 points | 0.32% | 1.25% | |
| Keysight Technologies | NULG +0.89 points | 0.14% | 1.03% | |
| Western Digital Corp | NULG +0.88 points | 0.18% | 1.06% | |
| Ecolab | NULG +0.85 points | 0.44% | 1.29% | |
| Mongodb Class A | NULG +0.73 points | 0.07% | 0.80% | |
| Caseys General Stores Inc | NULG +0.63 points | 0.21% | 0.84% | |
| Ww Grainger Inc | NULG +0.60 points | 0.32% | 0.92% | |
| Marvell Technology | NULG +0.57 points | 0.21% | 0.78% | |
| Iron Mountain Inc | NULG +0.53 points | 0.09% | 0.62% | |
| Xpo | NULG +0.49 points | 0.10% | 0.59% | |
| Edwards Lifesciences | NULG +0.43 points | 0.25% | 0.68% | |
| Rockwell Automation Inc | NULG +0.41 points | 0.09% | 0.50% | |
| Mettler Toledo | NULG +0.34 points | 0.23% | 0.57% | |
| Deckers Outdoor | NULG +0.30 points | 0.10% | 0.40% | |
| Rivian Automotive Class A | NULG +0.27 points | 0.09% | 0.36% | |
| Quanta Services Inc | NULG +0.24 points | 0.08% | 0.32% | |
| Equinix Reit | NULG +0.22 points | 0.37% | 0.59% | |
| Mckesson Corp | NULG +0.21 points | 0.33% | 0.54% | |
| Emcor Group | NULG +0.14 points | 0.08% | 0.22% | |
| Waters Corp | ESGU +0.11 points | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
| West Pharmaceutical Services | ESGU +0.10 points | 0.12% | 0.02% | |
| Zscaler | ESGU +0.09 points | 0.11% | 0.02% | |
| First Solar | ESGU +0.04 points | 0.09% | 0.05% | |
| Jb Hunt Transport Services | ESGU +0.03 points | 0.08% | 0.05% | |
| Comfort Systems Usa | ESGU +0.02 points | 0.06% | 0.04% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ESGU vs NULG Cost
Overpaying NULG vs ESGU
$2,221
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ESGU 0.15%
$3,137
NULG 0.26%
$5,358
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ESGU | NULG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $473 | $199 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,838 | $767 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $5,358 | $2,221 |
- 0.15%ESGU, cheaper
- 0.26%NULG
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
ESGU 13th cheapest of 47 funds
NULG 25th cheapest of 47 funds
ESGU vs NULG Dividends
- ESGU 0.94%, better
- NULG 0.11%
- ESGU $1.55
- NULG $0.11
- ESGU $0.38
- NULG $0.11
- ESGU Sep 15, 2026
- NULG Dec 18, 2025
- ESGU Sep 18, 2026
- NULG Dec 19, 2025
- ESGU Quarterly
- NULG Annual
Distribution history
ESGU vs NULG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ESGU
- NULG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ESGU 12.8%, betterNULG 17.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ESGU 1.35, betterNULG 1.01
- Worst fall
- ESGU −26.1%, betterNULG −35.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ESGU 1.04NULG 1.21
ESGU and NULG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
