WTV ranks 1st and ESLV 17th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
ESLV vs WTV
WTV −0.27pt a year
0.39%0.12%
WTV 34.4×the volume
5.03K173K
ESLV vs WTV Performance
+20.5%+21.6%
- ESLV 0.39%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- ESLV $19M
- WTV $3.35B
- ESLV +20.5%
- WTV +21.6%, better
- ESLV
- WTV 1.99%
- ESLV 124
- WTV 126
- ESLV 5.03K sh
- WTV 173K sh, better
- ESLV $28.78
- WTV $105.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ESLV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | D33 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | A84Higher |
| Durability | D31 | A89Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. ESLV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ESLVB
WTVA
In short
ESLV Faith-based investing usually means a big detour from the benchmark. Eventide screens US large-cap value names on ethics, then rebuilds the book to hug the Bloomberg U.S. 1000 Value index.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
ESLV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It actively manages a long-only portfolio focused primarily on U.S. large-capitalization companies with value characteristics, applies values-based screening, and seeks to limit tracking error to the Bloomberg U.S. 1000 Value Total Return Index.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ESLV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ESLV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying ESLV vs WTV
$5,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ESLV 0.39%
$7,898
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ESLV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $220 | $485 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $859 | $1,866 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $2,520 | $5,378 |
- 0.39%ESLV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
ESLV 18th cheapest of 64 funds
ESLV vs WTV Dividends
- ESLV
- WTV 1.99%
- ESLV
- WTV $2.14
- ESLV $0.09
- WTV $0.55
- ESLV Sep 29, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- ESLV Sep 30, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- ESLV Quarterly
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
ESLV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ESLV 11.9%WTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ESLV 1.14WTV 1.33
- Worst fall
- ESLV −5.9%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ESLV 0.30WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.