Skip to content

EVPF vs QTPI

Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF

EVPFBNasdaq

North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF

QTPICNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

EVPF −0.21pt a year

EVPF0.39%QTPI0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

EVPF 2.4×the volume

EVPF16.6KQTPI6.86K

EVPF vs QTPI Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−0.4%EVPF−1.3%QTPI

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. EVPF −0.4%. QTPI −1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−3%−2.5%−2%0%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EVPF 0.39%, better
QTPI 0.60%
Fund size
EVPF $58M
QTPI $77M
1Y total return
EVPF No data
QTPI +1.1%
Yield (12M)
EVPF No data
QTPI 4.42%
Holdings
EVPF 81
QTPI 55
Avg volume (30D)
EVPF 16.6K sh, better
QTPI 6.86K sh
NAV per share
EVPF $48.43
QTPI $24.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EVPF: Cost 90, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 52, Durability 36. QTPI: Cost 25, Risk 68, Mission 54, Tradability 24, Holdings 45, Durability 16.
Pillar letters and Scores for EVPF, QTPI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEVPFQTPI
Cost30% weightA90HigherD25
Mission25% weightNot scoredC54
Risk15% weightB58B68Higher
Tradability15% weightC54HigherF24
Holdings10% weightC52HigherC45
Durability5% weightD36HigherF16

Rank among Preferred Securities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EVPF and QTPI are both graded against the same 31 Preferred Securities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Preferred Securities⁠

Category · 31 funds
See all 31 ›

EVPF ranks 4th and QTPI 28th of 31 funds in the Preferred Securities Category.

  1. Rank 1APFFDGlobal X U.S. Preferred ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2APFFiShares Preferred and Income Securities ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BPFFVGlobal X Variable Rate Preferred ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BEVPFEaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 5BVRPInvesco Variable Rate Preferred ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 27CJPRFJPMorgan Preferred and Income Securities ETFScore 42
  7. Rank 28CQTPINorth Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETFScore 40
  8. Rank 29DPFFAVirtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EVPFBEaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF

QTPICNorth Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF

In short

EVPF Eaton Vance's preferred-securities team, ETF-wrapped: an active, concentrated run at the preferred and hybrid market for 0.39% a year, under the category's median fee. Active stock-picking in a corner usually sold by the index.

QTPI No data

Stated mandate

EVPF The Fund seeks total return and current income, primarily through preferred securities and other income-producing securities.

QTPI No data

Why people hold it

  • EVPF Active in a category built on indexes: Eaton Vance's fundamental team picks across preferred and hybrid securities instead of owning whatever a benchmark lists.morganstanley.com
  • At 0.39% a year, with no waiver propping it up, it undercuts index heavyweights PFF and PSK (0.45% each) and sits below the category median. Rare pricing for an active mandate.
  • Income is the mandate, not a byproduct: total return plus current income from preferred securities, with distributions declared monthly under the prospectus.
  • For a fund launched in 2026, the package lands in the upper tier of the roughly thirty US preferred ETFs on cost and mandate clarity.

QTPI No data

Worth knowing

  • EVPF Born March 2026, so there is no multi-cycle record of how the managers steer through a rate shock or a credit wobble.
  • Smaller and thinner-traded than the category's index incumbents, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the biggest preferred funds.
  • About 80 positions in preferred and hybrid securities, a rate- and credit-sensitive corner that ranks below bonds in the capital stack.sec.gov

QTPI No data

Full EVPF profile⁠

Full QTPI profile⁠

EVPF vs QTPI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EVPF vs QTPI Cost

Overpaying QTPI vs EVPF

$3,919

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EVPF 0.39%

    $7,898

  • QTPI 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EVPF 0.39%
  • QTPI 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530QTPI $11,817EVPF $7,898

Year by year

YearEVPFQTPIOverpaying
10$705$1,076$371
20$2,725$4,116$1,391
30$7,898$11,817$3,919

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%EVPF, cheaper
  • 0.60%QTPI
  • Middle half of Preferred Securities funds
  • Median 0.50%

EVPF 3rd cheapest of 31 funds

QTPI 23rd cheapest of 31 funds

EVPF vs QTPI Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
EVPF No data
QTPI 4.42%
Payout (12M)
EVPF No data
QTPI $1.10
Last payment
EVPF $0.28
QTPI $0.13
Ex-dividend
EVPF Oct 30, 2026
QTPI Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
EVPF Nov 5, 2026
QTPI Nov 3, 2026
Frequency
EVPF Monthly
QTPI Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

EVPFMonthly · 8 paymentsAll EVPF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Mar 31, 2026 $0.16; Apr 30, 2026 $0.19; May 29, 2026 $0.20; Jun 30, 2026 $0.25; Jul 31, 2026 $0.25; Aug 31, 2026 $0.25; Sep 30, 2026 $0.24; Oct 30, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
QTPIMonthly · 23 paymentsAll QTPI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.03; Jan 30, 2025 $0.09; Feb 27, 2025 $0.11; Mar 28, 2025 $0.11; Apr 29, 2025 $0.10; May 29, 2025 $0.12; Jun 27, 2025 $0.09; Jul 30, 2025 $0.09; Aug 28, 2025 $0.11; Sep 29, 2025 $0.10; Oct 30, 2025 $0.12; Nov 26, 2025 $0.08; Dec 29, 2025 $0.05; Jan 29, 2026 $0.10; Feb 26, 2026 $0.08; Mar 30, 2026 $0.10; Apr 29, 2026 $0.11; May 28, 2026 $0.10; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08; Jul 30, 2026 $0.05; Aug 28, 2026 $0.10; Sep 29, 2026 $0.11; Oct 29, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

EVPF vs QTPI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EVPF No dataQTPI 3.0%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EVPF No dataQTPI −0.17since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EVPF No dataQTPI −4.1%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EVPF 0.21QTPI 0.16

Popular comparisons

  • EVPFBvsPFFDA

    Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF · Global X U.S. Preferred ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTPICvsPFFDA

    North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF · Global X U.S. Preferred ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.23%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EVPFBvsPFFA

    Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF · iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTPICvsPFFA

    North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF · iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EVPFBvsPFFVB

    Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF · Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTPICvsPFFVB

    North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF · Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.