SEIV ranks 3rd and FBCV 31st of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
FBCV vs SEIV
SEIV −0.42pt a year
0.57%0.15%
SEIV 8.7×the volume
16.2K141K
SEIV +8.8pt
+20.0%+28.8%
FBCV vs SEIV Performance
+29.6%+27.7%
- FBCV 0.57%
- SEIV 0.15%, better
- FBCV $184M
- SEIV $1.62B
- FBCV +29.6%, better
- SEIV +27.7%
- FBCV 2.30%, better
- SEIV 1.57%
- FBCV 114
- SEIV 123
- FBCV 16.2K sh
- SEIV 141K sh, better
- FBCV $43.70
- SEIV $49.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FBCV | SEIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | C44 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. FBCV and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FBCVC
SEIVA
In short
FBCV A stock-picker's value fund, not a screen. Fidelity's managers run a concentrated book of large caps they judge to be trading well below what the businesses are worth, in an aisle crowded with cheap rules-based rivals.
SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.
Stated mandate
FBCV The fund seeks capital appreciation through a concentrated, large-cap value strategy focused on companies trading meaningfully below estimated intrinsic value and offering a margin of safety.
SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FBCV vs SEIV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FBCV vs SEIV Cost
Overpaying FBCV vs SEIV
$8,134
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FBCV 0.57%
$11,271
SEIV 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FBCV | SEIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,023 | $274 | $749 |
| 20 | $3,921 | $1,071 | $2,850 |
| 30 | $11,271 | $3,137 | $8,134 |
- 0.57%FBCV
- 0.15%SEIV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds
FBCV 41st cheapest of 64 funds
FBCV vs SEIV Dividends
- FBCV 2.30%, better
- SEIV 1.57%
- FBCV $1.01
- SEIV $0.78
- FBCV $0.12
- SEIV $0.21
- FBCV Sep 18, 2026
- SEIV Oct 5, 2026
- FBCV Sep 22, 2026
- SEIV Oct 6, 2026
- FBCV Quarterly
- SEIV Quarterly
Distribution history
FBCV vs SEIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FBCV 11.1%, betterSEIV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- FBCV 1.30SEIV 1.80, better
- Worst fall
- FBCV −15.5%SEIV −18.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FBCV 0.61SEIV 0.89
FBCV and SEIV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.57% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
