Skip to content

FEBT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF

FEBTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

FEBT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 5.8×the volume

FEBT24KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FEBT +7.2pt

FEBT+17.8%ZALT+10.6%

FEBT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.2%FEBT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FEBT +12.2%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FEBT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FEBT $102M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FEBT +12.2%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
FEBT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Holdings
FEBT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FEBT 24K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FEBT $42.54
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBT: Cost 68, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 46, Durability 44. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC54A79Higher
Tradability15% weightB63B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC46A90Higher
Durability5% weightC44B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FEBT 16th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 14BSIXOAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 16BFEBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETFScore 59
  5. Rank 16BSTENiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FEBT Allianz Life's hedging desk, packaged as an ETF. FEBT absorbs the first 10% of its S&P 500 ETF benchmark's price decline over each February-to-January stretch, trading away gains above a cap, at a fee under the buffer-fund norm.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FEBT The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a specified one-year outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FEBT Charges 0.74% a year, under the buffer-fund median and below same-benchmark rival BAPR (0.79%) and laddered BUFR (0.95%).
  • The options work is run in-house by AllianzIM, the Allianz Life arm that hedges the insurer's own annuity book, rather than farmed out.allianzlife.com
  • Plain, repeatable terms: a 10% downside buffer against the S&P 500 ETF's price return, capped upside, reset for a fresh one-year period every February 1.sec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its buffer-ETF peer group, helped by pricing below the cohort median.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FEBT Buffer and cap are set before fees (the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.26%), and the payoff tracks share price only, so index dividends sit out.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-period and you get whatever cap and buffer remain, not the headline terms. The clean slate arrives each February 1.sec.gov
  • One of the smaller, thinner-traded funds in the buffer aisle, so the spread between bid and ask deserves a look before trading.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FEBT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FEBT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FEBT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FEBT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFEBTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%FEBT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBT 0.00%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
FEBT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2024, same scale for both

FEBT1 paymentAll FEBT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2024. Jan 16, 2024 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102024
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBT 8.0%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBT 1.55, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBT −13.2%since Feb 2023ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBT 0.65ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FEBTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.