Skip to content

FEBZ vs ZALT

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

FEBZDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

FEBZ0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 51.8×the volume

FEBZ2.61KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

FEBZ +4.6pt

FEBZ+14.2%ZALT+9.6%

FEBZ vs ZALT Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+5.6%FEBZ+6.0%ZALT

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. FEBZ +5.6%. ZALT +6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FEBZ 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FEBZ $32M
ZALT $845M
1Y total return
FEBZ +5.6%
ZALT +6.0%, better
Yield (12M)
FEBZ 3.04%
ZALT No data
Holdings
FEBZ 16
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FEBZ 2.61K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
FEBZ $40.92
ZALT $34.72
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FEBZ: Cost 40, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings not scored, Durability 30. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 80, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FEBZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFEBZZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightD27A80Higher
Tradability15% weightD37B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightD30B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FEBZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FEBZ 70th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 70DDGOCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - OctoberScore 35
  4. Rank 70DFEBZTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETFScore 35
  5. Rank 72DAUGZTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FEBZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FEBZ Most buffer ETFs sell you downside protection and quietly take your upside in return. FEBZ skips the cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month stretch with no ceiling bolted onto the gains.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FEBZ FEBZ seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index while protecting against the first 8%-12% of index losses over a 12-month period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FEBZ No upside cap. Where most buffered funds hard-stop your gains at a set number, this one keeps participating as the index climbs.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Actively managed options on the S&P 500 Price Index, aiming to buffer the first 8% to 12% of index losses over a 12-month period that resets each February.true-shares.com
  • Running since 2021, part of the original uncapped buffered series rather than a me-too launch chasing the outcome-ETF boom.true-shares.com
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FEBZ Uncapped is not full upside. The issuer states the participation rate is expected to land below 100% of the market move, and it is reset with each period.true-shares.com
  • The buffer is a range (8% to 12%), set at each reset and measured from the period's starting level, so buying mid-period can mean less cushion than the label suggests.true-shares.com
  • Fee sits at the category median, and this is a small, lightly traded fund. Laddered rival BUFB runs 0.10%, so the uncapped design is what you are paying up for.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FEBZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FEBZ vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FEBZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FEBZ vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FEBZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FEBZ 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEBZ $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFEBZZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%FEBZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
FEBZ 3.04%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
FEBZ $1.20
ZALT None
Last payment
FEBZ $1.20
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
FEBZ Dec 24, 2025
ZALT No data
Paid on
FEBZ Dec 26, 2025
ZALT No data
Frequency
FEBZ Annual
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

FEBZAnnual · 3 paymentsAll FEBZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $2.08; Dec 27, 2024 $1.33; Dec 24, 2025 $1.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FEBZ 9.1%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FEBZ 1.20ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FEBZ −17.5%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FEBZ 0.72ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • FEBZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBZDvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FEBZDvsBUFMB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsBUFMB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.