SKOR ranks 4th and FEIG 12th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
FEIG vs SKOR
FEIG −0.03pt a year
0.12%0.15%
SKOR 33.7×the volume
4.46K150K
SKOR +2.2pt
−0.5%+1.7%
FEIG vs SKOR Performance
−2.4%+8.8%
- FEIG 0.12%, better
- SKOR 0.15%
- FEIG $49M
- SKOR $1.07B
- FEIG −0.3%
- SKOR +1.1%, better
- FEIG 4.95%, better
- SKOR 4.77%
- FEIG 794
- SKOR 1344
- FEIG 4.46K sh
- SKOR 150K sh, better
- FEIG $39.33
- SKOR $47.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEIG | SKOR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C44 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A77Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A76Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. FEIG and SKOR are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEIGA
SKORA
In short
FEIG A core investment-grade corporate bond fund with an ESG overlay: built to shadow a plain market-cap corporate index while screening out coal, tobacco and weapons, for 0.12% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
SKOR Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the market. SKOR scores every eligible bond on issuer quality and relative value, then weights toward the winners, and stays in the one-to-under-10-year maturity lane.
Stated mandate
FEIG The Fund seeks results that generally match the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Investment Grade U.S. Corporate Core Index before fees and expenses.
SKOR The Fund seeks to provide pre-fee investment results generally corresponding to the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust US Corporate Bond Quality Value Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEIG vs SKOR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEIG vs SKOR Cost
Overpaying SKOR vs FEIG
$617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEIG 0.12%
$2,520
SKOR 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEIG | SKOR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $274 | $54 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,071 | $212 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $3,137 | $617 |
- 0.12%FEIG, cheaper
- 0.15%SKOR
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
FEIG 5th cheapest of 49 funds
SKOR 10th cheapest of 49 funds
FEIG vs SKOR Dividends
- FEIG 4.95%, better
- SKOR 4.77%
- FEIG $1.95
- SKOR $2.26
- FEIG $0.18
- SKOR $0.20
- FEIG Nov 2, 2026
- SKOR Nov 2, 2026
- FEIG Nov 6, 2026
- SKOR Nov 6, 2026
- FEIG Monthly
- SKOR Monthly
Distribution history
FEIG vs SKOR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FEIG
- SKOR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEIG 6.5%SKOR 4.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEIG 0.24SKOR 0.44, better
- Worst fall
- FEIG −21.9%SKOR −14.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FEIG 1.11SKOR 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.